Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is the trouble with southwark council and the London mayor  they want everyone to get rid of their cars and cycle or walk yet you have nowhere safe to lock your bike away. I saw one of those green cycle cages all smashed up just off lordship lane where bike thieves had stolen some bicycles from it , nowhere is safe.

I didn't say Southwark in my stats.  But "only"?  That's a lot of stolen cars.  I'm a little confused about what this thread is about.  The need for better street parking for bikes?  Better parking at home for bikes?  Cycle theft and the need to tackle this?  Or a general dislike of cyclists and Southwark's policy of encouraging active, healthy, sustainable travel that helps improve air quality.  Or maybe all of these😀

12 minutes ago, malumbu said:

I didn't say Southwark in my stats.  But "only"?  That's a lot of stolen cars.  I'm a little confused about what this thread is about.  The need for better street parking for bikes?  Better parking at home for bikes?  Cycle theft and the need to tackle this?  Or a general dislike of cyclists and Southwark's policy of encouraging active, healthy, sustainable travel that helps improve air quality.  Or maybe all of these😀

I don't know mal, you tell us

You're the one who took it away from an enquiry about bike storage to include cars !!!

1 hour ago, malumbu said:

You could argue that Southwark also provide free parking space on the street for cars too .  And over 100,000 of those get stolen each year.

I dont own a bicycle,  I own a car , but people still need to be able to store their bicycles safely and securely on the streets like the person who posted this thread originally was asking .

1 hour ago, malumbu said:

I didn't say Southwark in my stats.

Actually, Mal, what you said in its entirety was

 

2 hours ago, malumbu said:

You could argue that Southwark also provide free parking space on the street for cars too .  And over 100,000 of those get stolen each year.

In normal usage the 'those' in your second sentence refers to the cars for which Southwark 'also provide free parking space'. You would have needed to say in your second sentence - 'And over 100,000 of cars freely parked in the UK get stolen...' Although of course the figures I quoted refer to all cars stolen, and not to those stolen from 'free' street parking - i.e. not off street or in garages , or in paid for parking spaces on road. For which I don't have figures. And of course as all those who live in CPZs know, Southwark does not provide free on-road parking in much of the borough. If you are going to 'throw remarks away', please do so accurately. Or make your hyperbole transparent. 

3 minutes ago, malumbu said:

In deed the op was about suggestions for bike storage, I'd reacted to the next post that had reverted to Southwark, pesky cyclists and bike theft.

Join LCC and ask Southwark Cyclists for advice on alternatives for storage.  Come on one of their rides, good to make friends.

I'm sorry Mal, there was nothing in Ted's post that mentioned pesky cyclists, he was simply drawing a parallel between southwarks desire for more cycling and not enough safe and secure storage 

Your ability to twist the ordinary into weird hyperbolic  rants knows no bounds at times. 

Maybe you should have gone to the opticians (you know the one) before replying 😉 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • was the price not displayed on the menu?
    • It has come to this author’s attention that the world of 4+ admissions — that most enigmatic of educational rites — continues to bewilder even the most composed of parents. Fear not. For in a former life, I was not merely a humble observer, but a seasoned educator of over twenty years, and Head of Pre-Prep for a distinguished dozen. Now, with quill exchanged for touchscreen, I have taken to that most modern of salons — Instagram — to dispense guidance, answer frequently whispered questions, and illuminate the shadowy corners of school selection with clarity and calm. Each post bears my signature twist: a blend of insight, levity, and the occasional raised eyebrow. Should you find yourself adrift in the sea of admissions, I suggest you peruse my latest dispatch. It may well be the lifeline you seek. The Delicate Dilemma of the Summer-born 4+ Scholars Yours in solidarity and scholastic savvy, Lord Pencilton  🎩✏️
    • Perhaps Gooseygreeny was not familiar with the wildlife before Gala was imposed on the park, since when its value to wildlife has deteriorated. The Park had never been disturbed before, as the council had respected it as a Site of Importance for Nature Conservation, so only the Common was licensed by them as a site for events. The first time Gala held their event, there was a tree with woodpeckers nesting in it right in the middle of the main field they used and thrushes, blackbirds and great tits nesting within the shrubs and trees immediately surrounding the field. The woodpeckers were thriving on ants from the anthills in the grass. To those of us who used to enjoy watching the wildlife, it was very obviously a Site of Importance for a variety of birds. Despite being accessed by the public and their dogs, it had been relatively undisturbed,  which was one of the main reasons why it was so special and why I have been opposed to the Gala festival being held during the bird nesting season.
    • So dangerous!    Can you be more specific about the road this was in and when you report it?  Maybe there’s some CCTV footage available
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...