Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There have been at least two or three threads on the topic in the last couple of years. I'm afraid they'll all confirm that you assumed wrongly.  I remember looking into it myself and finding nothing to assist anyone who made the same assumption. While recently having a look through the Townley Road appeals decided in 2023, I came across this determination that also clearly spells it out.

31/3/23 Reasons     Mr X appeals against two Penalty Charge Notices.
He argues that they have only been issued in order to make money for
the council. Mr X states that the restrictions were introduced to make
it safe for school students in the morning and afternoon and that as both
26th December 2022 and 2nd January 2023 were public holidays there
was no purpose in enforcing the restriction. The appellant states that he
was driving to collect an elderly relative.

Townley Road is a route that is for buses, cycles and taxis only Monday to
Friday 8-9am and 3-4.30pm. The restriction is in operation every Monday
to Friday whether or not schools are on holiday or if it is a bank or public
holiday. There was no indication on the sign that the prohibition was not
being enforced on either Monday 26th December or Monday 2nd January.

I have seen the CCTV footage in relation to each contravention. I have also
 seen photographs of the signs and camera car footage that show the signs
 and warning signs. I find that the signs are clear and that there is sufficient
 warning of the restriction to enable a driver to take an alternative route.

I find that each contravention occurred. I refuse both appeals.

Edited by ianr
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Err, are you saying that the Greens are not a political rival to Labour? Funny how those convictions only come to light when many politicians don't get what they want....do you honestly think that Cllr McAsh would have defected had he been allowed to lead Southwark council? Absolutely 1000% not.
    • He's not acting according to his convictions though, he's acting entirely according to his own ambition and self interest.  I'd be very concerned if I was a parent of a child in the Primary School he teaches at. His new party advocate teaching primary school children how to use crack cocaine and heroin: https://metro.co.uk/2026/02/21/green-party-says-primary-school-children-should-be-taught-to-take-drugs-safely-27031825/   Anyway, I feel we will finally be well rid of him. I don't believe he will stand in this ward. He will have a much better chance of election in Nunhead and Queens Road.
    • I trust people who act  according to their convictions regardless of what other people might think. I don't trust people  who stick with things which no longer feel right for them. I was once a fully paid up member of the Labour party, and went to local meetings. Along with a number of other people I know, I left the Labour party and  no longer go to local meetings. The Labour party has moved a long way to the right, and the Green party now represents much of what Labour used to stand for. I don't think "political rivalry" has anything to do with it. I find that a very strange choice of words.
    • I don't really understand the question in this context? I mean, yes, most of us are motivated by a degree of self interest but Rockets is not standing for election as a local councillor( is he?), nor did he stand for leadership of the Council, so in that sense does not have the power or influence to significantly affect thousands of voter lives. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...