Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Read some old threads but am new to the area. Accessed Court Lane by car from LL 2/3 times in past week before seeing a no entry for vehicle signs on the road prior to turning. 
From reading old posts it seems that it is fine to turn onto Court Lane however there is a camera between Court Lane and Calton Avenue and this turning is prohibited. Is my understanding correct?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/347159-ll-to-court-lane-signage-query/
Share on other sites

I think you are correct - there is a sign on Lordship Lane just near the BT phone exchange which appears to indicate that you cannot turn on to Court Lane but I think it is misleading and is referring to turn at the end on to Carlton Avenue. I am not sure why the sign is positioned there and not before the intersection with Eynella Road where it would be more accurate.

21 hours ago, Hanse said:

Read some old threads but am new to the area. Accessed Court Lane by car from LL 2/3 times in past week before seeing a no entry for vehicle signs on the road prior to turning. 
From reading old posts it seems that it is fine to turn onto Court Lane however there is a camera between Court Lane and Calton Avenue and this turning is prohibited. Is my understanding correct?

Yes, you are correct.  It's yet another misleading and confusing sign.

I think the council deliberately put them up to confuse as they are not at all accurate - it's almost as if they were trying to dissuade people from turning into the LTN area at all - or I did wonder if it was done to improve their monitoring figures when they had the strips down.

Edited by Rockets
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Considering the private revision study that my children undertook, perhaps 15 to 20 years ago in that library it seems a shame they have timed the refurbishment so it won't be open at this crucial time for children. But hey, so long as it's greener... 
    • Enforcement costs money which I doubt the fines actually pay for. Presumably it hasn't been a priority. 
    • Details here: https://www.southwark.gov.uk/2025/dulwich-library-closing-refurbishment
    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...