Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Read some old threads but am new to the area. Accessed Court Lane by car from LL 2/3 times in past week before seeing a no entry for vehicle signs on the road prior to turning. 
From reading old posts it seems that it is fine to turn onto Court Lane however there is a camera between Court Lane and Calton Avenue and this turning is prohibited. Is my understanding correct?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/347159-ll-to-court-lane-signage-query/
Share on other sites

I think you are correct - there is a sign on Lordship Lane just near the BT phone exchange which appears to indicate that you cannot turn on to Court Lane but I think it is misleading and is referring to turn at the end on to Carlton Avenue. I am not sure why the sign is positioned there and not before the intersection with Eynella Road where it would be more accurate.

21 hours ago, Hanse said:

Read some old threads but am new to the area. Accessed Court Lane by car from LL 2/3 times in past week before seeing a no entry for vehicle signs on the road prior to turning. 
From reading old posts it seems that it is fine to turn onto Court Lane however there is a camera between Court Lane and Calton Avenue and this turning is prohibited. Is my understanding correct?

Yes, you are correct.  It's yet another misleading and confusing sign.

I think the council deliberately put them up to confuse as they are not at all accurate - it's almost as if they were trying to dissuade people from turning into the LTN area at all - or I did wonder if it was done to improve their monitoring figures when they had the strips down.

Edited by Rockets
  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/738192  
    • Have you complained to the solicitor directly and did they respond within the 8 weeks they have under their code of conduct - I presume they have and this is why you have escalated further to the SRA? If he doesn't respond in a timely fashion per the SRA code of conduct then I am sure they will need to take action.
    • What a bunch of ignorant nimbies.  Their own tweet conspicuously ignores the actual content of their own article FFS. Immediately after the incorrect paragraph quoted about it being unlawful to burn coal wood etc they sit out the actual position:   "However, the use of authorised smokeless fuels in an open fireplace is allowed, as well as burning smoke-generating fuels in an approved stove or burner."   leaving that out is as thick as flying into the amazon rainforest on a private jet to attend Cop 31 thus week.
    • I had to pull this cat back from speeding traffic as she was almost clipped - TWICE -  by passing motorbikes on Underhill Rd. Needless to say, I was seething that anyone would let this cat out onto the streets, specially a street that I struggle to cross myself. When I initially approached her, I thought she had already been injured. By some miracle, she wasn't, she was just paralyzed by fear. Do NOT let this cat out onto the streets. Microchip: 933082600574914
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...