Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thanks for posting Jah. According to the Premier

> League's CEO, Utd's troubles are now affecting the

> global appeal of the Premier League


The second I heard this I knew Scudamore was seeking a scapegoat for any fall in interest in the Premier League, which he has negotiated up and up for such a long time.


But the fact is it's the best EPL for many years.

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I really can't understand the "Moyes Out"

> mentally, we love him-as do Liverpool, Everton,

> Chelsea...........................................

> ................... te hee hee ;-) I'd say

> Arsenal-but !!!!


But what? Nice to see petro gazillions don't always guarantee success. I hope Liverpool win the league, just to reinforce the fact that you don't need a sugar daddy to win the league. City fast becoming at loathsome as CSKA Fulham and Yanited.

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I genuinely could not care less how popular the

> Premier League is around the world.


The Premier is nothing more than a brand and has been for years. I'm not surprised the allure is starting to wear off. Ours isn't the only product beamed around the globe.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I'm saying nothing until after tomorrow's

> match,

> > but so far so good...

>

> That's all I need, as if this season hasn't been

> bad enough already.

> Gotta love a John Terry own goal though... :)


John Terry truly is a c*nt and no mistake

Pos Team Played GD Points

1 Chelsea 32 38 69

2 Liverpool 31 45 68

3 Man City 30 52 67


Potential final points if they don't drop any


Chelsea - 87

Liverpool - 89

Man City - 91


In my book that still makes it City's to lose. Yes I know city have to go to Anfield, but that means Liverpool have to TAKE those points away from City.


And as yesterday showed, any of these teams could drop points elsewhere. Hell, Liverpool may well drop some this afternoon...

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's also City's to lose, and they still hold an

> advantage, because if both teams win all their

> other remaining matches, Liverpool would have to

> beat City at home, a draw wouldn't be good

> enough...


Yeah, but a win would be and they are at home.

I agree it's all ifs and buts and I don't really expect any of the teams to finish with a 100% record from now on in. My point really was that it's a long time since Liverpool have been in such a position with so few games left.


I've noticed the City game is the same week-end as the 25th anniversary of Hillsboro'. I don't think that's ideal for Liverpool with all the emotion that will be flying around that week. City were at OT for the 50th of Munich and won 2-1. If my memory is correct, the general opinion was that United played as if they were affected that day.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Pos Team Played GD Points

> 1 Chelsea 32 38 69

> 2 Liverpool 31 45 68

> 3 Man City 30 52 67

>

> Potential final points if they don't drop any

>

> Chelsea - 87

> Liverpool - 89

> Man City - 91

>

> In my book that still makes it City's to lose. Yes

> I know city have to go to Anfield, but that means

> Liverpool have to TAKE those points away from

> City.

>

> And as yesterday showed, any of these teams could

> drop points elsewhere. Hell, Liverpool may well

> drop some this afternoon...



Believe!!!!

13 years today gone but not forgotten, David "Rocky" Rocastle. "Remember who you are, what you are, and who you represent" Saw David many times in the late 80's standing on the platform at Forest Hill station dressed in his Arsenal track suit carrying his boots in a boot bag. How times have changed. Always courteous to fans and well wishers, always cheerful. Wish there were more like him today. R.I.P. Rocky

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...