Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We are planning a move to the area in a few months with our two children ages 3 and 1. Our 3 year old is due to start reception in September 2014 and I was wondering if we have missed the boat in terms of getting him in to a good independent school in the Dulwich area. I have heard all sorts of horror stories that we ought to have put the children's names down the second they were born, but are we really too late?


We will miss out on trying to get a place in state primary school as we won't be moved in time.


Any advice or experiences gratefully received! Thank you!

If you are planning to be in the area in the next few months I don't think you will be too late to apply for the state schools - I think it's January that applications are made.


As far as independent schools go, I don't think there's any truth in the thinking that you enrol them as soon as they are born. Places are offered after assessments I think? I'm sure someone with experience in this will confirm.

Yes, Pickle is right, places offered after assessments, which you apply for according to the schools' own deadlines, which seem to be Autumn or Jan for the schools we've looked at in the area. So I think the horror story of signing them up at birth is a myth! Though if they have a nursery attached, priority goes to their nursery children so they may have only have a small number of places when it comes to new children entering reception. The schools' websites usually outline the entry process and timetable for applications.


Good luck with the move! East Dulwich is wonderful!

Thank you both! That's a relief, we are busy registering with a few at the moment but we were worried we would get a lot of "welcome to the bottom of the waiting list" responses! Fingers crossed that won't be the case.


Unfortunately we will be well out of time for the state schools, we won't be moving for at least 6 months (pity - I can't wait to move!) but there are so many pieces of the jigsaw puzzle to put into place before then (including persuading our wonderful nanny to move with us and do a nanny share once our 3year old is in full time school) and the small matter of finding somewhere to live!


Just out of interest does anyone know whether it would be possible to walk the children from East Dulwich to Rosemead or Oakfield? I am very keen to avoid the school-run if I can...


Thanks!

DUCKS would be a definite no go as that really is as soon as you are pregnant as they take kids from (I think) 6 months)


Dulwich Prep (where my kids are) will have their assessments Dec-Jan (depending on your sons birthday) and although it is assessment based but I would get your sons name down soonish so that you're 'in the system'. There are 3 classes in Nursery and then it moves to 4 in Reception - my son's class had 3 "new boys" in reception so lets say that's 9 across the 3 original classes and then there's a new class of 20 so last year there were 29 Reception places (not sure how many applicants I'm afraid).


Herne Hill is another option that although it is first come first served for the early stages I'm pretty sure that 4+ is assessment based (however there are obviously a lot of children already at the school that will get automatically put through).


I don't know too much about Oakfield or Rosemead in terms of applications except that I'm pretty sure they're assessment based as well.


So we live in ED (Friern Road) and mine go to DP on Gallery Road and I don't walk - basically for my two it would just be too far at the beginning of a very long day or even worse at the end of the day. However like you I don't like doing the 'school-run' so what I try and do is drive to the Court Lane entrance of Dulwich Park and then scoot/cycle through the park, across the chapel and then up Gallery Road. It's a lovely walk and not too far for their legs :)


Good luck with the move and I hope everything goes well with the schools.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
    • Regardless of “Blighty” it’s the combination of “we” “R” and “Blighty” we means there is a them  cancerian may or may not recognise a dog whistle.  If he doesn’t, we are trying to point one out.  If he does then they are trying to gaslight us into pretending they are just a lovely fundraising group with no agenda 
    • I’m on Darrell Road and have noticed this recently - your daughters are not alone! It seems to only be at night. Would you agree? High pitched and consistent. I’ve been wondering if it’s a street lamp, or a fox deterrent system.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...