Jump to content

Charter North Dulwich - material Safeguarding issues at the school? CND hiding key Safeguarding information? parents' experience?


Recommended Posts

Hello

I'm keen to understand the differing view of parents of pupils at Charter North Dulwich with regards to the school's approach to dealing with bullying, misogyny, threatening, violent and abusive behaviour including physical assault and Safeguarding in general.

And whether parents believe that Charter North Dulwich meets its Duty of Care obligation to its pupils at all times?

In July 2023 it was communicated to parents that there was a very material failure of Charter North Dulwich's Safeguarding rules and procedures .

The Designated Safeguarding Lead was immediately removed from this role.

There is a reference in the September 2023 Minutes of the Board of Governors that there will be a full discussion of Safeguarding at the next meeting which was held on 23 November 2023.

No Minutes of the Board of Governors Meeting on 23 November 2023 are publicly available on the website of Charter North Dulwich but Minutes of subsequent meetings are available.

Charter North Dulwich has had 5 different Designated Safeguarding Leads in the last 3 years.

Do parents believe that Charter North Dulwich has actually improved its Safeguarding rules and procedures in practice or do parents believe that Charter North Dulwich has an institutional problem with its Safeguarding?

Are parents worried about their child's safety and security at Charter North Dulwich in the light of the material failure of its Safeguarding policy and procedures in July 2023?

What is their experience and the experience of their child since that time?

Do parents believe that Charter North Dulwich and its Board of Governors are deliberately hiding the information with regards to its material Safeguarding issue by not publishing the Minutes of the Board of Governors Meeting on 23 November 2023?

Thoughts and experiences welcome.

  • Like 1

If there was a safeguarding failure of the magnitude you’re describing then it should have been referred to Ofsted. There may well be an investigation and/or subsequent inspection triggered by this.  Schools are required to publicise no-notice inspections on their websites so you may not have long to wait to find out if this is the case.

Thank you for your reply

There is no obligation on Charter North Dulwich to report this material Safeguarding incident in July 2023 to Ofsted

The obligation on any person or body regulated by Ofsted to self report relates to something called a “Significant Event”

 

However there is no definition of a “Significant Event” 

 

The regulated party, in this case, Charter North Dulwich, has complete discretion in how they define if a matter constitutes a “Significant Event” and therefore whether or not to report such a matter to Ofsted

 

The letter to the parents in July 2023 from Charter North Dulwich reporting the material Safeguarding issue is very clear as to the steps the school is taking to address the matter.

 Equally, the letter very clearly makes no reference to the school reporting this material Safeguarding incident to Ofsted.

 

There is no other evidence in the public domain that Charter North Dulwich reported this material Safeguarding incident to Ofsted.

 

What ICO says at https://ico.org.uk/for-organisations/foi/freedom-of-information-and-environmental-information-regulations/public-authorities-under-foia/ may be relevant:

Schedule 1 may not list an organisation in the way you expect. For example, within the education sector, the school itself is not the public authority. That falls to the governing body of a school, further education institution or university.

The police will not investigate a Safeguarding issue at a school as it is not a criminal matter per se and do not have the available resource 

The local authority does not have any oversight or regulatory authority for an Academy school

A complaint to Ofsted will initially be answered within 30 working days or 42 calendar days

A complaint may be made directly to the school or to a parent Trust of such a school; however, they determine how it will be processed and by whom

Separately, under the UK Government Guidance dated September 2024 

"Keeping Children Safe In Education 2024: Statutory Guidance for Schools & Colleges"

It is stated in Part One: Information for all School & College Staff

"Part 1, 2: In order to fulfil this responsibility effectively, all practitioners should make sure their approach is child centred.  This means they they should consider, at all times, what is in the best interests of the child"

 

Other than the two routes outlined above, there appears to be no alternative way to ensure that a school abides by their Duty of Care at all times and in a way whereby such breach can be immediately or quickly cured and in a manner which is in the best interests of the child at all times unless someone is able to refer to an alternative route?

 

  • 1 month later...

Good Evening, 

Thank you for this post.

Yes, I agree TCND are not Safeguarding the children properly and I am concerned that members of staff do not take report’s seriously. I too have concerns and was going to address the Governors, however, reading what you have written makes me think that they are all init together. I just can’t wait for my children to finish at this school. 
 

So to answer your question, no they have not improved their Safeguarding and yes I believe that it is an institutional issue. I hope that helps.

  • 3 weeks later...

Nice bit of defamation of character 

Just checked and you said similar about the Head 

Have you complained or would you prefer to be anonymous and go through social media?

Edited by malumbu
  • 4 weeks later...

As far as I'm aware, they HAVE changed a lot since 2023 with regard to safeguarding, including the safeguarding lead leaving and being replaced. 

However I'm not sure this is the place to have the discussion, as the Forum is going to end up dealing with defamation issues if people have to be specific with evidence to back to their claims, or else people are talking in such vague terms as to make the discussion pointless. 

 

Edited by QueenMab
Clarity

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...