Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Evening all,

 

Just wanting to seek advice for my father in law.
 

Earlier this year he was caught driving in the wrong direction of the A10 dual carriageway (don’t ask!). He was in the 2nd lane and fortunately the cars going in the correct direction were in the 1st lane. Once he realised he braked hard and did a 3 point turn to go in the correct direction. Luckily no one was harmed. This was all recorded and reported by an off duty police officer. Don’t think he has any excuse just a really bad mistake.

An intention to prosecute letter was sent through the post which he replied to, unfortunately he used an expired 1st class stamp. The letter came back undelivered many months later.


The police  have escalated this to the courts since they think no one has responded. He has to make a court appearance later this month.

 

Just wanting to know if anyone knows what the most probable punishment is likely to be?
 

He’s worried he’ll lose his license. It’s important he keeps his license as he’s a taxi driver and that’s his only income. He’s had a clean license for the last 5 years. He’s happy to take points/pay a fine as he knows his mistake. 

Any advice welcome also.

many thanks In advance 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/350567-road-traffic-incident-advice/
Share on other sites

Sounds like many points and a large fine - the latter usually depends on income.  Obviously all depends on circumstances.  I expect that if this was a Prince Phillip situation he many have been asked to voluntarily surrender his license.  Going to court is quite serious, speed awareness course is the common course of action when drivers have been a little careless.  My only experience on the size of fine was overhearing a bloke saying he was going to go to court to challenge 3 points speeding, doing 80, on the A2.  The points came with a modest fine maybe a 100 quid plus, court was up to £1200.  This was many years ago.

Practice what he is going to say as mitigating circumstances.

  • Thanks 1

Outwith the communications failure were there any other mitigating circumstances - i.e. visibility at the time, confusing signage etc. which might have led him to accidently enter the wrong carriageway? Does he know how this might have occurred?

Clearly when he realised he tried to take the right remedial action. But clearly also he was guilty of the offence, he was driving the wrong way down a dual carriageway, but anything that can be said in mitigation after a guilty plea may lessen the penalties involved. 

If he's a member of a motoring organisation (i.e. AA; RAC) then they I think have legal advisors who may assist (ideally you  need experienced road traffic offences lawyers) and who may be able to present the mitigating case in the best possible light. 

  • Thanks 1

On line suggests 3 points, depends no doubt on circumstances, and how lenient magistrate is regards the size of the fine.  Wouldn't expect there would be any value in paying for legal advice/support unless covered by insurance policy or the like, and unless proper procedure has not been followed probably no value

  • Thanks 1
4 hours ago, Penguin68 said:

Outwith the communications failure were there any other mitigating circumstances - i.e. visibility at the time, confusing signage etc. which might have led him to accidently enter the wrong carriageway? Does he know how this might have occurred?

Clearly when he realised he tried to take the right remedial action. But clearly also he was guilty of the offence, he was driving the wrong way down a dual carriageway, but anything that can be said in mitigation after a guilty plea may lessen the penalties involved. 

If he's a member of a motoring organisation (i.e. AA; RAC) then they I think have legal advisors who may assist (ideally you  need experienced road traffic offences lawyers) and who may be able to present the mitigating case in the best possible light. 

He tells me that the gps location on his phone was bouncing around which confused him, which potentially caused him to miss the road signs. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson ather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...