Jump to content

Mamas and Papas Hayworth 2 in 1 Cot and Toddler bed with changing table, mattress, protector and sheets - for sale £100


LizzieC

Recommended Posts

Solid wood cot that has 3 different height settings so it can be lowered as they grow. The sides can be taken off so it can be converted into a toddler bed. It was used by our son up until age 5. There are a few light scratches on the wood from use by our kids (see picture for example). Dowel rods to strengthen connection between the two part headboards are missing but these are unnecessary as all the bolts hold everything together. We used it without them for 5 years and it was solid as a rock! Assembly instructions included. Comes with a changing table that can be placed across the cot. The set is selling for £254 new online (https://www.pramcentre.co.uk/cots-cot-beds-furniture-c11/mamas-papas-hayworth-package-p2796). We’re also throwing in the mattress (always used with protector) and organic cotton mattress protector, 6 fitted sheets, a duvet, 2 duvet covers and a pillow case as we don’t need them anymore.

£100

For collection from SE15

IMG_2476.JPEG

IMG_2478.JPEG

IMG_2479.JPEG

IMG_2481.JPEG

IMG_2483.JPEG

IMG_2484.JPEG

IMG_2485.JPEG

IMG_2486.JPEG

IMG_2489.JPEG

IMG_2490.JPEG

IMG_2185.JPEG

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...