Jump to content

Accessible Aerial Workshop


Recommended Posts

Aerial isn't easy. But the challenge is part of what makes it so fun!  We're all about making it as accessible as we can. So this workshop is for people who want a slower paced aerial class and might need some more assistance. We will rig the equipment at a lower height and provide as much support as we can to get you making some shapes in the air, most likely on slings and hoop, but we're flexible on this one too. The workshop is two hours long so everyone can have a go with plenty of time for breaks!

Join us at Flying Fantastic Peckham on Sunday 13th October from 3-5pm!
 
We welcome wheelchair users, disabled people, visually impaired adults as well as deaf adults. If you don't live unassisted, you may need to bring a carer to class. 

We would like you to introduce yourselves before booking so we know what to plan. So if you'd like more information or to find out if this class is for you, please drop [email protected] a line and we'll do our best to help. 

Cost: £20 for the two hour session - subsidised by Open Aerial (Charity No. 1186538) 

photo_5994646358411296950_y (2).jpg

photo_5994646358411296953_y (2).jpg

Workshops (14).png

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/351792-accessible-aerial-workshop/
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...