Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'd be grateful if this thread was not hijacked.  This is separate to any beef about cyclists, motorists, LTNs etc etc

I've resisted buying either of these products, and feel a little uncomfortable about surveillance society.  The number of cash for crash scams has had me thinking, and I've just had a number of incidents when out cycling in recent days- dangerous overtaking, person driving on a mobile, two times today cars speeding down a bus lane on Lordship Lane.  These type of incident often come in clusters, and I'll have weeks which are relatively quiet.  However the road rage this morning, when  a group of us where threatened by a psychopath in a van, was maybe a watershed moment.   The central London road, part of the London bike network, was narrow, with no room to overtake.  After squeezing past a few of us he told us in no uncertain terms that we had to get our of his way, twice getting out of his van in a matter tens of seconds, to intimidate us.  Not witnessed this deranged (drugged up?) behaviour for many years.

So any recommendations for, any experience of, dash and/or helmet cams?  

By all means discuss the pros and cons of having them.  But not cars vs bikes, thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
    • Saying one thing so everyone can understand, and something different that only select people can understand is not inclusive, it’s dangerous.  
    • I'm not deliberately swerving anything. What exactly have they said in their communications in languages other than English that you object to? Why would they put those communications in other languages when the whole point was to connect with a specific group of people? Apologies if I've missed your point.
    • The point (which you're swerving) is not that the Greens spread their message in a language other than English - it's what they have said, and why they're shy about saying the same thing in other languages, including English. If a party in Northern Ireland circulates leaflets in Ulster Scots only that tells voters to elect them so they can be a strong Protestant voice, and has videos in Ulster Scots only that seek to discredit the First Minister by showing (a propos of nothing) images of them meeting the Pope - is that inclusivity or sectarianism?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...