Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Dulwich Hill SNT will be at Christ Church Barry Road at 11 am Monday 21st October. They were previously holding these meetings at a pub in Forest Hill Road,

It is an informal event and an opportunity for local residents and businesses to discuss concerns etc.  Meet in the café area

Obviously should there be an emergency/riot/protest etc - the above may not take place. 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/352740-cuppa-with-a-copper/
Share on other sites

Pleased to announce that the above went ahead which gave a few residents of Dulwich Hill the opportunity to meet 2 of our local police team.  Car and mobile phone thefts were concerns raised by local residents.

Next Cuppa will take place on Monday  25th November 2024 at 11am  Make a note in your diary

  • Thanks 2

It is to do with shift patterns, they were  working 10 am - 7 pm. Many of those who spoke with the team today were retired. They hold meetings in the evenings every 3 months. The next one is the first week in December at 6.30. I believe it is the 4th but will double check and publish details nearer the time. Some time ago people complained that evening meetings were difficult to attend as could not get babysitters and wanted day time meetings. Being half term there were folk with children in the café, but were not interested in talking with the officers.

Would it not be possible to organise a team or zoom meeting so more local residents have the benefit / even if it is once a quarter?together with once a month face to face especially as local crime is c on the increase.

So many local residents are missing out - housebound, families, people who work.

Have to say, quite surprised that this ward and police have the time to do this. 
 

  • Like 1
6 hours ago, beansprout said:

Would it not be possible to organise a team or zoom meeting so more local residents have the benefit / even if it is once a quarter?together with once a month face to face especially as local crime is c on the increase.

So many local residents are missing out - housebound, families, people who work.

Have to say, quite surprised that this ward and police have the time to do this. 
 

A Zoom meeting is a  great idea. It would be much more convenient, though it possibly has other downsides, eg it may exclude people who aren't familiar with Zoom or don't have the necessary technology.

Though tbh - and making a huge assumption - I wouldn't have thought there were many of them in this area.

Edited by Sue

One of the benefits of the live meetings is being able to take one of the PCS aside for a quiet word, to mention something you'd prefer to be discrete about. That may be a neighbour issue, or something more concerning. Or maybe it's simply a question you might be embarrassed to ask too openly. Zoom meetings don't support that. PCs use these events as sources of local information and to get an informal look at people. Again more difficult in Zoom where you have less opportunity to 'read' body language. There are meetings where Zoom is a good addition to, or even substitute for live, but I don't think these are them. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
11 minutes ago, Penguin68 said:

One of the benefits of the live meetings is being able to take one of the PCS aside for a quiet word, to mention something you'd prefer to be discrete about. That may be a neighbour issue, or something more concerning. Or maybe it's simply a question you might be embarrassed to ask too openly. Zoom meetings don't support that. PCs use these events as sources of local information and to get an informal look at people. Again more difficult in Zoom where you have less opportunity to 'read' body language. There are meetings where Zoom is a good addition to, or even substitute for live, but I don't think these are them. 

Fair enough points.  I've never been to one.

It wouldn't occur to me that a meeting like that was the right place to have a "quiet word" with someone!

Maybe the purposes of them should be better publicised, or maybe I just haven't been paying attention.

I'm a bit worried about your comment about "getting an informal look at people".

Why would they need to do that? Surely it's a relatively small self selected group of people who attend these meetings?

Edited by Sue
6 minutes ago, Sue said:

I'm a bit worried about your comment about "getting an informal look at people".

If a topic is raised, say concerns about street dealing, and everyone is engaged, interested and looks involved that tells you something, if everyone apart from the questioner looks bored or confused maybe it isn't a burning local issue. You can 'read' live meetings better than Zoom normally,when most people are just looking at their screen/ camera. And not actually at the speaker. 

15 minutes ago, Penguin68 said:

If a topic is raised, say concerns about street dealing, and everyone is engaged, interested and looks involved that tells you something, if everyone apart from the questioner looks bored or confused maybe it isn't a burning local issue. You can 'read' live meetings better than Zoom normally,when most people are just looking at their screen/ camera. And not actually at the speaker. 

How many local people are usually at these meetings? 

6 hours ago, Penguin68 said:

No more than 4-5 at one time, for the ones I've been in, but people do leave and go as it's informal ('cuppa with a copper' is a good description). This is different from formal meetings where reports are made.

That's surely not anywhere near enough to get a feeling for what local people think about a particular issue?

1 hour ago, jazzer said:

They need to be out "Policing" stopping and solving criminal activity

Why is information gathering not considered to be policing. They need to know about alleged crime before they can solve it.

Edited by OutOfFocus

There are more effective and efficient ways of reporting i.e. online rather than dragging them away from doing what they get paid to do, catching criminals, as in all the car thefts which have been rampaging across SE22 and into SE23, turning up to break ins, stopping anti social behaviour, drug activity etc. 

Edited by jazzer
  • Agree 1
1 hour ago, beansprout said:

I am no longer in ED…the point is there is never going to be a good time for everyone..

Be very grateful to have this opportunity to engage with pc plod..

It is held in a church, which may I add safe - for everyone..

 

 

 

I thought there had recently been thefts from local churches?

I am afraid that the days when it was normal to have a copper on the beat who was seen daily are long gone. Those of us who have lived in ED  for years will remember our old beat officer Adrian Crust who spent around 10 years in the area. Adrian knew his patch and the informal chats he had with residents and businesses gave him essential information of crime/possible crime/concerns etc. Also for many years we had a local police station (plus police horses) where you could pop in to give/receive information.

During the pandemic, the SNT held zoom meetings from their base at the time in Gipsy Hill. These were well advertised via social media and EDF - attendance varied from about 4 - 8 people.  The SNT is now based along with many other teams in Peckham Police Station.

Dulwich Hill Team cover from Crystal Palace Road, Forest Hill Road, Wood Vale plus the Dawson Heights Estate, They work on foot so are limited in what they can cover on a shift. At the moment they are down to 2 staff due to sickness.

On their way to the Cuppa Session, they were stopped by a number of residents who had various concerns i.e car thefts/damage etc which they noted. 

Dulwich Library= this was used by SNT for a few sessions but was abandoned as residents felt uncomfortable in a public place with limited privacy. If privacy is requested in Christ Church- the police can access one of the vestry rooms.

Whilst many of the regular attendees do have access to computers etc, the Wi Fi connection is not always brilliant in Christ Church. I will mention the idea of zoom meetings to the team when I next see them. The aim is to have monthly Cuppa Sessions during the day and continue with the evening quarterly meetings.  

Police visibility over the year has been patchy as they have been called to cover riots/demonstrations etc.

Many people complain that the police do not do anything- what has been noticed that incidents are not being reported to the police. This came up at the evening meeting where several comments were made about incidents (mobile phone thefts) which were taking place around a specific area. Despite the number of incidents- the victims had not actually informed the police on the basis that the police would not do anything. Details were given to the officers present at the meeting.

 

  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • of course most people would avoid the "stupid" term - but I'm sticking with it fact is no other European would be so dumb, and even with the same information, the  same media, the same everything, 2 of the countries within the UK saw ho stupid an idea it was - but only the English (who played a large part in the Welsh result) pushed ahead - there is something defiantly arrogant and stupid and it isn't just down to bad info and bad leadership But that was all 2016 - it's people in 2025 who claim it to be a good idea executed badly who are especially stupid Now - does calling people stupid help anyone? It's not especially politically gainful and just gets peoples' backs up - but it remains a truth and only when the country as a whole genuinely holds it's hands up and admits the stupidity (rather than downplaying it as a poor decision - no shade meant Mal - you are just nicer and politer than me) will it begin. to turn the tide Also worth mentioning that yes I am as intractable and blunt with friends and family who voted Leave as well - this isn't me hiding behind some online anonymous account. This is what I'm like
    • Hello My name is Lizzie and I work locally as a dog walker and nanny. I won’t be needed over Summer so will have full availability for a dogsitting job. I have a DBS certificate and will provide several dogsitting references as well. Please note that I can only watch your pet at your home since they are sadly not allowed in my flat! Looking forward to hear from you
    • The decision to leave the EU was a poor one, but I'd avoid the term stupid when applied to the masses (the decision was of course stupid) and blame those who willingly misled.  A certain N Farage (pronounced with a hard G rather than the soft G he affected, rather continental eh?) being one of the main culprits. He blames the Tories for not delivering Brexit, and not really clear how Labour are playing this.  But ultimately what sort of Brexit were people voting for?  And ditto what future were people voting for last Thursday?
    • "That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’. " I'm certainly calling them wrong. And many of those 17 million agree with me now and have expressed regret. Many others were indeed thick, and remain so. You can see them being interviewed all the time. As for insulting, the losing side in that referendum have being called every name under the sun "enemies of the people" etc etc - so spare me the tears about being insulted But for clarity. there is a certain type of individual who even now thinks Brexit was a good idea, tends to side with Trump and holds views about immigrants - and yes I am happy to calll those people thick. - and even worse Jazzer posts a long and sometimes correct post about the failings of modern parties. I myself think labour are woefully underperforming. But equally it has been less than a year after 14 years of mismanagement and despite some significant errors have largely steadied the ship. You only have to speak to other  countries to recognise the improvement there. They have cut NHS waiting times, and the upside of things like NI increases is higher minimum wage - something hard-bitten voters should appreciate. They were accused of being too gloomy when they came in and yet simultaneously people are accusing them of promising the earth and failing to deliver - both of those can't be true at the same time Fact is, this country repeatedly, over 15 years, voted for austerity and self-damaging policies like Brexit despite all warnings - this newish govt now have to pick up the pieces and there are no easy solutions. Voters say "we just want honest politicians" - ok, we have some bad news about the economy and the next few years  - "no no not that kind of honesty!!! - magic some solutions up now!" Anyone who considers voting for Reform because they don't represent existing parties and want "change" is being criminally negligent in ignoring their dog-whistles, their lack of diligence in vetting, their lack of attendance (in Westminster now and in eu parties is guises past) and basically making all of the same mistakes when they pushed for Brexit - basically, not serious people   "cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised." - can we see that promise? I don't recall it? Because whatever voters or govts want, the cost of things is not exactly entirely in their gift. People were warned prices would rise with Brexit and e were told "we don't care - it's a price worth paying!". Turns out that isn' really true now is it - people DO care about the cost of things (and of course there are other factors - covid, trump, tariffs, wars etc.    What the country needs is a serious, mature electorate who take a high level view of priorities and get behind the hard work needed to achieve that. There is zero chance of that happening so we are doomed to repeat failures for years to come, complaining about everything and voting for policies which will make things worse here we have labour 2024 energy manifesto commitments - all of it necessary long term investment - calling for immediate price cuts with no money in the kitty seems unrealistic given all of the economic headwinds   https://www.energy-uk.org.uk/general-election-2024-all-manifesto-energy-pledges/#Labour_Party
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...