Jump to content

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, malumbu said:

It's been four years since the junction was closed, perhaps time to move on?  Maybe even enjoy the lovely square.  Or keep your issues to the LTN thread rather than bringing a downer on this one.

It's been 4 years, your concerns aren't important to me , get on with your life and stop trying to fix an injustice 

Blimey mal, good job you aren't involved in the horizon or similar scandals 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
15 hours ago, Bicknell said:

just because time passed doesnt make it fair for people  with   disabilities


I regularly see people with disabilities benefitting from the inclusive, car-free space. 

Last week there was a group of young adults with disabilities with their teachers, reading books and enjoying the sunshine on the benches. On Tuesday a group of people with disabilities from the charity Wheels for Well-being were cycling through on one of their inclusive rides. Everyday I see children and elderly people with disabilities travelling through the space more easily and safely than they would have before when it was filled with cars.

 

 

  • Thanks 1
17 minutes ago, march46 said:

The latest update on the council's website states the opposite, presumably this is based on their VivaCity data.

No, the Council is reporting the increased number of people standing around an area that once had live traffic in it - probably an increase from the time of Covid when we were all locked up anyway, and hardly surprising - people tend not to mill about active roads.

The reference to 'footfall' refers to passing pedestrian traffic which then goes into shops - which is what keeps the shops open (assuming they then buy anything). Shops seem to be reporting fewer customers.

The two 'figures' are not incompatible. They are measuring different things. Fewer people buying stuff to support the local economy, more people aimlessly milling about on what used to be a road with traffic.

Edited by Penguin68
  • Like 2
  • Agree 1

This is laughable. The landscaped junction is not a 'community hub' the shops where people walk to buy stuff, the restaurants, the pub and nearby parks  are what draw people in. I have little doubt though that LCC and Southwark Cyclists will do their very best to make this seem a 'destination'.

Hard to shop if you can't walk or wheel? How? There is disabled parking right outside the shops. 

I defy anyone to say look at those before and after shots and say that it's not a nicer space now for pedestrians. Whether you'd rather prioritise people driving through is another matter, but for pedestrians, it's objectively a better space.

All a bit confusing since that last comparison photo shows a tarmac road with 20mph on it. This must be pre landscaping of the junction? Not sure what this is promoting? Perhaps it was hard to find another photo of the alleged 'community hub' with many people in it?

Visiting at the weekend, you get people sitting outside to drink coffee etc they have bought, but they did that anyway, it is not like it is a new thing.

Weekdays, well it is pretty much just a bigger cycle thoroughfare...a very expensive way to cheer the likes of Malumbu up.

 

Edited by first mate
1 hour ago, Spartacus said:

Ahhh so you were the problem driving through it every day 😅

Me driving during peak hours.  I don't think so.  You may be surprised that there are other ways to commute.  

Much faster.

Cheaper.

More healthy.

Better for the environment 

And smugger 

3 minutes ago, malumbu said:

Me driving during peak hours.  I don't think so.  You may be surprised that there are other ways to commute.  

Much faster.

Cheaper.

More healthy.

Better for the environment 

And smugger 

Not your Harley fat boy again 

 

Such a noisy beast 

A Harley - something you will have never seen me on.  Even before Trump's tariffs.  The company was selling over weight over priced bikes that hardly anyone wanted, so Reagan put a massive tariff on the large, cheaper, and better Japanese bikes which saved the Harley brand.  Sounds familiar!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_motorcycle_tariff

And 30 years before that cool American bikers did not ride Harleys

image.jpeg.a62e565a6dd3806e9d69c8d00bba57f9.jpeg

Triumph 6T Thunderbird

19 minutes ago, malumbu said:

A Harley - something you will have never seen me on.  Even before Trump's tariffs.  The company was selling over weight over priced bikes that hardly anyone wanted, so Reagan put a massive tariff on the large, cheaper, and better Japanese bikes which saved the Harley brand.  Sounds familiar!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1983_motorcycle_tariff

And 30 years before that cool American bikers did not ride Harleys

image.jpeg.a62e565a6dd3806e9d69c8d00bba57f9.jpeg

Triumph 6T Thunderbird

Are you now claiming to be a rebel without a clue ? 

  • Haha 1
3 hours ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

Hard to shop if you can't walk or wheel? How? There is disabled parking right outside the shops. 

I defy anyone to say look at those before and after shots and say that it's not a nicer space now for pedestrians. Whether you'd rather prioritise people driving through is another matter, but for pedestrians, it's objectively a better space.

pls check parking for dv shops for those with disabilites.  eg if east of  junction none at end of court lane just bike racks  & escooter bay. nnot easy

seperate point but clash  pedestrins/cyhles (not c;;ear who jas right of way) makes it  feel unsafe if your walking

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...