Jump to content

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Bicknell said:

pls check parking for dv shops for those with disabilites.  eg if east of  junction none at end of court lane just bike racks  & escooter bay. nnot easy

seperate point but clash  pedestrins/cyhles (not c;;ear who jas right of way) makes it  feel unsafe if your walking

There was never disabled parking on court lane (although agree it would be good to have some put in - perhaps write to the council?). There is disabled parking outside the shops. The only change is that you can't drive through the junction - which applies equally to everyone. There is a lot more room now if you're disabled or in a wheel chair to actually navigate around the shops. I do not get this point about there not being clarity about right of way between bikes and pedestrians. The is a road is now filtered to remove motor cars, is narrower (making it easier to cross) and has been curved round to slow the remaining vehicles; but there is still clear separation between the road and the pavement / pedestrian area.

Edited by Earl Aelfheah

The council knew that people were protesting about their needs from the outset. The council should have thought about all this and factored those needs in, before proceeding. It reflects really badly that DEI clearly has not been carefully considered and reasonable adjustments made to implementation.

1 hour ago, first mate said:

The council knew that people were protesting about their needs from the outset. The council should have thought about all this and factored those needs in, before proceeding. It reflects really badly that DEI clearly has not been carefully considered and reasonable adjustments made to implementation.

What's the issue you're objecting to? No disabled parking has been removed. To travel from the end of court lane to the disabled bay on calton avenue is 0.2 miles (less than one minute) via Dekker road. Previously one had to turn through the junction, which was roughly the same distance but also heavily congested. I would wager it's quicker now. Plus the pavements are considerably wider / there is more room in front of the shops and the number of pedestrians being injured in collisions with all vehicles has reduced. 

If you want additional disabled bays, ask for them. 

Edited by Earl Aelfheah

Those who are disabled should not have to ask,  not when millions of pounds have been spent reconfiguring a road junction into a public space with equal access and facility for all. 
 

Perception of safety is a valid issue. Those less able bodied may feel more at risk if pedestrian areas are regularly ridden through by cyclists. Being on edge affects wellbeing negatively. When the junction was a road, the clear demarcation between road and pavement reduced that sense of risk. That clear demarcation has completely gone.

Edited by first mate
  • Like 1

If you read the documents you'd know that the council did lots of work to ensure the square is inclusive and accessible for everyone. Transport for All and Wheels for Wellbeing did site visits and provided accessibility audit reports.

Worth noting, no comments were received about the need for blue badge holders to drive through the junction.

  • Agree 2
4 hours ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

What's the issue you're objecting to? No disabled parking has been removed. To travel from the end of court lane to the disabled bay on calton avenue is 0.2 miles (less than one minute) via Dekker road. Previously one had to turn through the junction, which was roughly the same distance but also heavily congested. I would wager it's quicker now. Plus the pavements are considerably wider / there is more room in front of the shops and the number of pedestrians being injured in collisions with all vehicles has reduced. 

If you want additional disabled bays, ask for them. 

long way  from disabled parking  spaces to chemist  . not easy if walking is hard.

people have asked for disabled parking at end of court lane.  nothing happned.  makes no sense

 

  • Like 1
54 minutes ago, Bicknell said:

long way  from disabled parking  spaces to chemist  . not easy if walking is hard.

 

But this isn't anything to do with the square. It was the same distance before the filters were put in. I'm not saying it's not an issue, but what's the link with the LTN?

There is also parking directly outside the chemist, as there was before.

54 minutes ago, Bicknell said:

people have asked for disabled parking at end of court lane.  nothing happned.  makes no sense

Do you know why the council has refused to put a disabled parking bay on court lane? Seems very odd.

Edited by Earl Aelfheah
18 minutes ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

But this isn't anything to do with the square. It was the same distance before the filters were put in. I'm not saying it's not an issue, but what's the link with the LTN?

well less parking for every one   now   near chemist. before junction closed there were more  near shops  (eg in calton &court lane) .  and  if blue badge holder (cant drive through, dont want long  jouney round  in traffic )must choose disabled parking space 1 side or the other - and you likely want 1 near chemist . whcih theyre not

bad planning. 

1 hour ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

But this isn't anything to do with the square. It was the same distance before the filters were put in. I'm not saying it's not an issue, but what's the link with the LTN?

There is also parking directly outside the chemist, as there was before.

Do you know why the council has refused to put a disabled parking bay on court lane? Seems very odd.

no i dont know why. 

your right. its very odd. also unkind and uncaring

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
2 hours ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

But this isn't anything to do with the square. It was the same distance before the filters were put in. I'm not saying it's not an issue, but what's the link with the LTN?

There is also parking directly outside the chemist, as there was before.

Do you know why the council has refused to put a disabled parking bay on court lane? Seems very odd.

no i dont know why. 

your right. its very odd. also unkind and uncaring

@Earl Aelfheah just a thought but council seems  to listen to some not others. might you ask for this? no idea if that wd work but worth a try . pls help if you  can

There are things people moan about, and at the same time things people should campaign for. I've said so many times it is a shame with so much energy going into anti this, anti that, and anti the other time could be better spent.  You've identified a good cause.  Go for it, I will happily support if I am permitted.

  • Agree 1
59 minutes ago, malumbu said:

There are things people moan about, and at the same time things people should campaign for. I've said so many times it is a shame with so much energy going into anti this, anti that, and anti the other time could be better spent.  You've identified a good cause.  Go for it, I will happily support if I am permitted.

pls help if you can too. 

  • Like 1

Presumably you're aware that people with blue badges aren't limited to only parking in blue badge bays? See below from Southwark Council's website.

The new CPZ in Dulwich Village has provided many shared use bays and pay-by-phone bays that are free to use with a valid blue badge.image.thumb.png.1b7a385550c7be7b95ae99b2ca3fc086.png

  • Thanks 1
1 hour ago, march46 said:

Presumably you're aware that people with blue badges aren't limited to only parking in blue badge bays? See below from Southwark Council's website.

The new CPZ in Dulwich Village has provided many shared use bays and pay-by-phone bays that are free to use with a valid blue badge.image.thumb.png.1b7a385550c7be7b95ae99b2ca3fc086.png

thanks @march46     doesnt give  parking in dv near to chemist   if you  find walking difficult

There's car parking outside the chemist and the chemist offers a prescription delivery service - helpful for anyone having difficulty walking.

There's also now cycle parking for people with disabilities outside the chemist - a great addition as for some people their cycle is their mobility aid. 

Edited by march46
correct grammar
  • Haha 1

The inference that those who have difficulty walking can just 'give-up' and go for home prescription deliveries instead does not feel very inclusive. Perhaps, along with the disabled cycle parking, there needs to be more than one car parking space outside the chemist or very close by.

There is a disabled parking bay in front of Meghan's on DV as well as one on Gilkes Place on the side of Meghan's. There is also one round the corner on Gilkes Crescent where it meets Calton avenue. 

The overall number of parking bays (paid ones with 30min free) is the same as before. This was achieved by creating new parking bays on Gilkes Place. They're not obvious to spot for those used to parking on the parade but they're there. I'm also glad the council has retained the free 30min as they'd initially proposed getting rid of it. 

10 hours ago, march46 said:

There's car parking outside the chemist and the chemist offers a prescription delivery service - helpful for anyone having difficulty walking.

There's also now cycle parking for people with disabilities outside the chemist - a great addition as for some people their cycle is their mobility aid. 

pls check. no parking right outside chemist . nearest disabled spaces outisde megans (chemist stopped delivering to evceryone after  junction clsoed - have tehy started again?) & gilkes/calton - if hard for you to wlak (likely if have blue badge), these spaces long way from chemist.  not kind. not fair

15 minutes ago, Bicknell said:

pls check. no parking right outside chemist . nearest disabled spaces outisde megans (chemist stopped delivering to evceryone after  junction clsoed - have tehy started again?) & gilkes/calton - if hard for you to wlak (likely if have blue badge), these spaces long way from chemist.  not kind. not fair

So disabled parking 20m away from the chemist is not okay, but parking right outside, i.e. 5m would be okay? 

I think a disabled bay 20m and another one 25m away seems fair enough. If it's really too far to walk, then I really think home deliveries should be the way to go. Plenty of pharmacies provide this service if the one in the village doesn't. 

15 minutes ago, ArchieCarlos said:

So disabled parking 20m away from the chemist is not okay, but parking right outside, i.e. 5m would be okay? 

I think a disabled bay 20m and another one 25m away seems fair enough. If it's really too far to walk, then I really think home deliveries should be the way to go. Plenty of pharmacies provide this service if the one in the village doesn't. 

design should focus on needs of all.  

anwser is not, well stay at home then

The latest design is arguably an improvement on the previous design in terms of disabled parking outside the parade of shops -

now: two disabled bays outside Megan’s, with sloped kerb with wheelchair accessibility

before: one disabled bay outside Megan’s 

If you go back even further there was no disabled parking bay outside the shops until local campaigners, Clean Air Dulwich, highlighted the need for one. 

https://x.com/cleanairdulwich/status/1435918240828559367?s=46&t=cUvwfh8eXSgRnyQIZ_cO2w

thanks @march46

before junction  closed, more parking  generally (eg on calton, court lane, etc) .  with new design, & because junction  closed to blue badge holders, v important that disabled parking in right place so ppl with disabilties do not have  to walk far.  

all that money on redesign 

Love the way everyone (who are, i suspect, able bodied) speaks for the disabled and tells us how great or easy access to Dulwich village is. 

Let me be frank, it's not easy to get there for a large group of people unless they drive and that is the nub of the problem with the current layout. 

I'm not, but just making the point that driving on a blue badge is not the only way those who have walking issues can maintain their mobility.  As March points out there are adapted bikes and wheels for wellbeing do a wonderful job in giving an experience of the different options.  And mobility scooters.  I have no idea which is the most suitable option for an individual.  Maybe more than one.  

Edited by malumbu

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good luck with this - there have been several requests over the years by students needing to do infant observations.  I was lucky when I did mine  - way back in 1994 at a local nursery. Have you tried contacting the NCT to see if there are any local groups who would be willing to participate? As a mother of 2 - found the observation very informative - mine was a 2 year old child as my course stated a child under 3. Got my highest grade for this project so was very happy.
    • Happy birthday! I've just read a bunch of your reviews and really enjoyed it. You write Interestingly without being too ornate, and you manage to give a really good insight into the "vibe" of a place as well as the food. Totally agree with your review of Rocca - it's simple, great food in a friendly atmosphere at a completely reasonable price, esp considering the location.
    • Hello,  I am a 52-year old mother and an integrative counsellor who lives and works in West Dulwich, SE21. In mid January I am starting a new training in Parent Infant Psychotherapy (helping parents to bond with their babies), and a key component of the course is a 24-month infant observation.  I’m looking for someone who will be giving birth ideally in January or February and who would allow me to observe their baby for one hour a week until the baby’s second birthday. The baby can be awake or asleep, playing, feeding, eating or interacting with carer/s and family members - whatever they normally do at that time.  The purpose of the observation is to enable me to gain a thorough knowledge of very early infant development and to develop the capacity to maintain an observationally minded and non-judgemental attitude in my work as an infant-parent psychotherapist.  I will provide enhanced DBS clearance and I’m happy to answer any questions.  Please forward this email to anyone who might be interested, email me at [email protected] or call me on 07949716043. I would be extremely grateful for any leads. Many thanks,  Millie  Millie Burton, MBACP Integrative Counsellor [email protected] millieburton.com
    • I keep my promises...had the Sweet & Sour Chicken.  It was great - the best sweet and sour dish I've ever had. The chicken itself was good and the sauce seemed home made with real vegetables and pineapple - it is NOT the red sugar sauce goo you get elsewhere.  The Korean fried chicken was very good but the sweet chili sauce was much more chili than sweet - just far too spicy for me. There is a honey something sauce that I will get next time. Egg fried veggie rice was good as a side.  We also ordered the chicken katsu curry which was polished off so quickly I didn't get to taste it. It looked very good tho. SD is not like Magic Wok used to be - cheap and filling but junk food. (Don't get me wrong - I went often to Magic Wok). SD's food is much higher quality, real ingredients, chunky portions, freshly prepared. I'll be back, for sure.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...