Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Moovart said:

I believe "Dulwich" is deemed where Dulwich library is situated so left at Peckham rye and straight up Barry Road

Or turning left,ย  continuing on down Forest Hill Road and turning right further up.ย 

Google maps has Dulwich marked at the junction by the old Grove, where the South Circular heads off towards the rest of Dulwich.

But whatever, yes you can definitely get to Dulwich by going in the direction shown on the signpost!

I'm not sure you would get "anywhere" by going straight down, though, let alone 23 miles down ๐Ÿคฃ

I like the "Now here" though!

Edited by Sue
  • Like 1
15 hours ago, sebastiondangerfield said:

The dogs on the street know that Dulwich is straight ahead , Goose Green, turn left and there you have it๐Ÿ˜œ

It's easier to turn left at that junction than to go straight ahead, though, because if memory serves there are only two lanes,ย  and buses turning right (there is no right turn for cars)ย  clog up the right hand lane.

And the distance driven is probably about the same.

5 hours ago, sebastiondangerfield said:

Not everyone wants to go to the library,

the real Dulwich (village) is straight ahead.

Eh? Straight ahead of what?ย 

If you turn left at Goose Green, as you also posted above, you end up at the library. Then the Grove.

Then, unless you turn right at the South Circular, you end up at Forest Hill!

Edited by Sue

From the sign.

Turn left up Peckham Rye, turn right onto Barry Road, straight across at the lights onto Eynella Road which leads you to Court Lane and Dulwich Park.

You could turn right here and Dulwich Village is at the end of Court Lane.

Of course you could stand by the sign and be โ€œNow here or Nowhereโ€

  • Like 1

ย 

2 hours ago, sebastiondangerfield said:

Dear Sue, straight ahead from the sign in question. Left at Goose ย Green, right at East Dulwich Grove and on to the real Dulwich.๐Ÿ˜œ

I think this could go on endlessly, so I suggest we finish it here!ย 

But why don't youย  track down the makers of the sign? Which hopefully has amused a lot of people, as well as brightening my bus journey.

Tellย  them that their directions to Dulwich are not only wrong, but they do not seem to know where the "real" Dulwich is ๐Ÿคฃ

I'm sure they will be delighted ๐Ÿคฃ

ย 

In the old days you used to be able to access the actual Dulwich by turning left there and travelling down eynella road.ย 

Someone asked James McAsh to look into updating the sign when they closed those roads to Dulwich and I think he said he'd look into it when he used to visit this website.

Perhaps someone from the Dulwich society can enlighten us on why Dulwich Library/ Dulwich Plough is deemed "Dulwich" for geographical purposes. ๐Ÿ™

Personally I had always thought it was because it was determined as that for the tram stop in the days of trams and then for the number 12 bus.

I believe that public transport was once excluded from central Dulwich, so if you wanted to take e.g. a bus to 'Dulwich' the Library was about as close as you could get and hence that became Dulwich for maps. The Estate thought that public transport was infra dig.ย 

6 hours ago, CPR Dave said:

In the old days you used to be able to access the actual Dulwich by turning left there and travelling down eynella road.ย 

Someone asked James McAsh to look into updating the sign when they closed those roads to Dulwich and I think he said he'd look into it when he used to visit this website.

But the sign being discussed here is a joke sign, not an official sign!

6 hours ago, CPR Dave said:

ย 

Someone asked James McAsh to look into updating the sign when they closed those roads to Dulwich and I think he said he'd look into it when he used to visit this website.

He gave up using this website because some people on here gave him a really hard time.

2 hours ago, Sue said:

But the sign being discussed here is a joke sign, not an official sign!

He gave up using this website because some people on here gave him a really hard time.

It's actually an official sign, it's just the bottom third that's been covered over by the Poundland Banksy. The font gives it away.

It used to be sign-posted to Brixton, if I remember correctly.

ย 

Edited by David Peckham
Update
  • Thanks 1
10 hours ago, David Peckham said:

It's actually an official sign, it's just the bottom third that's been covered over by the Poundland Banksy. The font gives it away.

It used to be sign-posted to Brixton, if I remember correctly.

ย 

Ah, thanks, I hadn't realised that!

To be honest, I'd never noticed it until it was mentioned on here. It's really subtle, but there's a small subscript/signature in the bottom right of the added bit saying 'Be Here Now'.

I've tried to Google that, but it just comes up with Oasis's overproduced, yet underwhelming, third album of the same name.

I wonder whether was influenced by this:

https://metro.co.uk/2024/11/11/bizarre-london-sign-directions-california-finally-corrected-15-years-21971040/


ย 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.ย  That is the whole point of my original post.ย  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.ย  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.ย  What on earth do you mean? ย 
    • Surprise, surprise. It didn't take them long, did it. This will be something of a test as to how much the council really care about parks and the environment. A footfall of 60,000. Are they mad? There is no way this park is designed for or can sustain that sort of use. Just had a look at the schedule. If allowed to go ahead, this will involve a large slice of the park (not the common) sectioned off and out of use for three weeks of May and the first week of June. Here's an idea, why not trial the festival in one of the other Southwark Parks, so the 'goodness' can be shared around the borough?
    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worryingย  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
ร—
ร—
  • Create New...