Jump to content

Crystal Palace Road - Double yellows East side between Crawthew and the Actress


Recommended Posts

There are intermittent double yellows on the east side of CPR between Crawthew Grove and the Actress.  Everyone ignores them - this side of the road is always fully parked.  I'd always assumed that as they aren't distinct for the most part - and mostly seem to have been painted over in black at some point in the dim and distant past - that they don't apply any more. I've lived in this stretch since 2013 and I park my car here most of the time and have never got a ticket.  Until last week that is.  Does anyone know whether the double yellows in fact do apply?  Which would be mad as they serve no prupose and are igored by one and all.  And did anyone else get a ticket last week?  Thanks!

ARGH!  I mean west side!

https://geomap.southwark.gov.uk/connect/analyst/mobile/#/main is the map location, and attached is my harvested search result.  I selected the "Parking Bays (Traffic Restriction Orders)"  folder from the RH list of overlays, then deselected all the many item types with labels starting 'TRO' until finding the orangey one labelled "TRO Double Yellow Line" that lit up the CPRd ones.  There's also a facility on the map to open a table of TROs, which I'm happy to leave to someone else to investigate.   Unless you can find only one TRO matching a location and, after careful reading, find that it's of limited duration that's been exceeded, I think you should  probably assume that its matching yellow lines are thought to be  active.  If there's a disparity between the map and actuality I've no idea if that affects a line's legal status.

PS And better not trust my negative finding of no other line types on the map in that location without confirmation.

 

Screenshot 2024-11-29 at 12-29-28 Spectrum Spatial.png

Edited by ianr
  • Like 1

I had a look today as I was walking that way.  You can hardly see them as double yellows they are so black and faded I don't think you would see them if you were in a vehicle. and there were cars parked all along that stretch, none had tickets.

I would take some photos and dispute the ticket.

 

 

 

Edited by Kathleen Olander
Spelling error

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...