Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


We have agreed a net hourly rate with our nanny as that made sense in terms of understanding current rates etc, however as I am setting up payroll I've read about gross pay being the new trend because of new HMRC rules. Does anyone have any further insight into this? Are the potential cost differentials in the 10s, 100s or 1000s? I don't want to go back on our original agreement obviously, but equally want to have a better understanding of the financials.


This was the posting I read: http://www.payefornannies.co.uk/parents/net_vs_gross.htm


Any insight appreciated


Dev

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/35460-nanny-pay-gross-or-net/
Share on other sites

Hi,

We have just been through the same process. I think the issue is not so much an quantifiable figure but more that if you agree a net wage you are effectively guaranteeing the nanny a certain amount, whatever her personal tax affairs, and you therefore bear those risks. For example, if she had issues with tax from a previous year, you could ultimately pick up those costs. Similarly, if tax or NI went up, you would bear this cost. With a gross wage, that would be her risk. We had an informal agreement on a net wage but did agree to put a gross wage into the contract. If you didn't want to re-trade your agreement, you could put a net wage in the contract but add wording that it is conditional upon a certain personal tax code, no unpaid tax from previous years, no other part time jobs etc.

Good luck with it all.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • To be fair to Sue, she doesn't have to explain or justify why she supports or wants to vote for any party. That is the same for everyone. We are free to decide which party best reflects what we think is important to us. Discussing the stances/ policies of parties, in a general discussion, can be done without targetting anyone commenting here. Politics is just a point of view at the end of the day.  Different things are important to different people, often for very valid reasons. Let's be respectful of that.  My opinion is that if say the Labour Party wants to understand why it is losing supporters to the Greens, it needs to listen to and understand the reasons why. That theme has been explored in this thread a little through the discussion around councillor McAsh. The same is true of the Tories losing support to Reform and the Libdems. Let's not also assume that every member of every party is completely on board with every policy of the leadership of that party either. You only have to look at how backbenchers have forced u-turns from Starmer's cabinet on things like Welfare Reform and WFA to see that. 
    • As a compromise I'd be prepared to trial the reintroduction of dog licensing. The annual licence fee would be the same as road tax for Range Rover (same carbon emissions as a dog) and would require owners to pass a responsible dog ownership exam, the dogs would need to pass training and a behaviour exam and their DNA would need to be kept on record to identify the owners who leave dog shit all over the pavements, so that they can be jailed.  
    • Yeah  Ban people, that will solve all the planets environmental issues over night  Leave the dogs as they aren't the problem, its normally bad ownership and management that leads to badly behaved dogs. Spartacus  Ps Cat Rule 
    • Some people are all of the above. Would happily ban them, or send them to training school
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...