Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We are looking for people who want to set up a friend or family member to appear on a prime-time, family friendly hidden camera show.


The person we are looking to set up:

- is approximately 25-45

- lives in a house (or ground floor flat with direct street access i.e. does not share a door to the street)

- has a good sense of humour


If you have someone in mind please get in touch as soon as possible! Please email: [email protected]


Oh, and please keep it a secret so as not to ruin the surprise!


Many thanks,


Chris

Oh no it's you isn't it Ant? you're going to get some unsuspecting TV licence payer involved in some rip-roaring, head-spinning, celeb-pranking, prize-winning shenanigans.


You'll ensure they have more fun than you can shake a banana shaped phone at, so everyone check out the link above to see what Ant's going on about.

Oh no it's you isn't it Dec? you're going to get some unsuspecting TV licence payer(?) involved in some rip-roaring, head-spinning, celeb-pranking, prize-winning shenanigans.


You'll ensure they have more fun than you can shake a banana shaped phone at, so everyone check out the link above to see what Dec's going on about.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'm not sure it's sensible  to presume any agreement from interlocutors, but if you do, then do I agree that it's the right thing to say so. My own guess -- it's nothing more -- is that the officers were acting just to effect an arrest on arrival, as requested, quite possibly without any knowledge of the content of wretched tweet at all*, and that their being armed was absolutely incidental.  But I don't know any reliable facts. I do think the turning up (5?) en masse to do so was possibly complacent and unthinking, if there was no reason to believe the arrestee was a threat.  If they had  been doing so for good reason, I guess they could have had at least one weapon trained at him, and had  him hands above head or on the ground in no time.  But I know no reliable facts of the incident whatsoever.  Perhaps they were Father Ted fans -- seriously -- and trogged along, on a quiet afternoon  -- to see the man himself.  Perhaps they and/or their CO will get a severe bollocking from above.  I don't know. * But even that with some reservations.  The last time I looked up cases on wrongful arrest, years ago, I think I remember there being held then to be at least some onus on the acting arresting officer to be satisfied that  the required grounds for a lawful arrest  did exist.  And I don't know any of the facts of the present case. 
    • They carry guns at the airport.  It may not make it ok but that is a fact.  In France and America they all carry guns.
    • TfL and the Met had a small team a few years ago dedicated to addressing bike theft.  https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2011/february/officers-target-bike-thieves-and-successfully-reunite-stolen-bikes-with-their-owners I assume that went with austerity. There is now a Task Force https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/metropolitan-police-service-cycle-taskforce And some advice from the MPS: https://www.met.police.uk/cp/crime-prevention/keeping-vehicles-safe/how-safe-is-your-bike/ The marking service is good and helps.  As a cyclist you do your best to minimise the likelihood and I would never leave a high end bike locked on the street out of sight.  I've had three bikes stolen in London over the last two decades. Gum Tree sadly makes it too easy and for every bike theft there is someone knowingly or unknowingly prepared to buy a bargain that is stolen.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...