Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is the point. We can see the effects of the erosion of democracy elsewhere in the world right now; it is disturbing to see a Labour council turn a blind eye to what a consulted majority think and instead impose the agenda it wants. The council had no mandate to make these local changes, but it has gamed the system to make them anyway.

  • Agree 1
  • 2 weeks later...
On 06/02/2025 at 13:22, Earl Aelfheah said:

Annual concentrations of roadside nitrogen dioxide (NO2) almost halved in London between 2016 and 2023. And preliminary figures indicate London’s annual NO2 levels were lowest on record in 2023 – lower even than first year of COVID-19 lockdowns. So it's fairly clear that the mayors policies are having a significant impact on air quality.

Do you have links to these statistics please? The only positive stats I've seen were from lockdown, when clearly pollution decreased.

On 14/02/2025 at 07:06, Rockets said:

Is there any LTN that has majority support in its local area (and i am not talking about a single street that has the closure)? It seems like they are installed on the whims of councillors and a few vocal activist groups who are in cahoots with the council and then residents have to live with the dire displacement consequences and are then ignored and belittled by councils and the pro-LTN lobby when they dare say they may not be working.

Plus they help generate millions in fines, as per stats mentioned above. LTNs are a bad idea aside from for those who live on the roads that have been closed or cyclists.

On 15/02/2025 at 09:35, first mate said:

This is the point. We can see the effects of the erosion of democracy elsewhere in the world right now; it is disturbing to see a Labour council turn a blind eye to what a consulted majority think and instead impose the agenda it wants. The council had no mandate to make these local changes, but it has gamed the system to make them anyway.

Odd confusing representative democracy with Putin invading Ukraine.  Look at any democratic organisation and they will implement policies where they don't go out to members.  Labour is broadly centre left, probably supporting the environment, active travel, workers' rights, the welfare state etc etc.  Not sure what you are expecting?   Tory boroughs/governments also do much if this, until Sunak, all Tory led governments this millennium were very supportive of active travel, Johnson introduced the ULEZ which he expected would be extended to the circulars, Tory boroughs have parking controls and road restrictions.  Five years on I doubt if the LTNs are going away.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representative_democracy

 

Edited by malumbu
On 01/03/2025 at 19:01, Jellybeanz said:

The only positive stats I've seen were from lockdown, when clearly pollution decreased.

I have not seen any stats showing air quality getting worse in London. Data show the exact opposite, air quality improving, both across the capital, and in SE22 specifically.

Could you perhaps provide the sources you're referring to?

Here is the official air quality monitoring data (NO2) for the local area:

SDT Location 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
139 Lamppost (2139 - L29) Grove Lane     33.2 24.1 27.5   18.6
136 Lamppost (2160 - L12) adjacent to Dog Kennel Hill School     33.8 20.2 23.9 22.3 20.1
138 Lamppost (2127 - L11) Pytchley Road     31.1 24.7 27.4 25.9 23.4
114 Lamppost No 1 Goose Green / East Dulwich Road 37.4 31.6 33 22.6 25.2 25 21.8
161 Lamppost 2120-02 adjacent to 8 East Dulwich Grove           29.2 25.3
162 On the southern downpipe at Harris East Dulwich Primary School, Lordship Lane           23 22.1
151 Junction of Townley Road & Lordship Lane Lamppost ( 2300 - 01)     28.6 18.6 22 20.1 17
97 Barry Road 37.5 37.3 32.5 24.3 26.8 24.4 23
Edited by Earl Aelfheah

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I went last week and would recommend. I was very happy to see pricing based on hair length and especially a fringe trim price. I live nearby and don’t need it fully styled / blown out after a cut (curly so usually prefer to do it myself) so I like that it is variable pricing in that way. 
    • Memes top of lordship haircut shampoo blow dry about £25  dulwich barbers hair cut about£22  jazzes haircut about £26 
    • Re Day One, £52 for a short hair cut (cut & styling) and £72 for a long hair cut (cut & styling) which I believe is below the ears.  £38 for a blow dry which doesn’t appear to be included in the cut price as it’s not mentioned.  £15 for a fringe tidy.      I remember being startled to be charged separately for a blow dry by the salon that used to be in Melbourne Grove but is now closed down.  I was asked if I wanted a blow dry after the cut and highlights and said yes, but wasn’t told that I would be charged separately.  Only found out when I went to pay the bill.    Was offered a voucher on a further appointment.    De.Salon which used to be Cut-Throat in Peckham (Choumert Rd and Brixton) charge from £45 for a Short haircut that finishes by the ears.  They charge from £40 for any haircut that finishes below the jawline.  Their prices include a blow dry.  But if you have thick hair they charge an extra £15 for every additional 15 minutes for cutting.     I had my hair cut there before the name change.  I don’t understand the from part of the price. Had a look at the Blue Tit pricing which is very complicated. They charge depending on the stylist’s  experience.  Crab Salad in Peckham  -  short hair cut above the ear - from £69.    Long hair Cut below the ear from £80. Blow dry not mentioned as being included in the cut but is priced at £55 I noticed that Kuki charge different prices for men and women.  Doesn’t seem right if a woman has short hair and a man has long hair.   I used to go to a great salon in NW London  that charged the same price for men and women and stopped going when they upped their prices for women.  
    • BIAB is supposed to be less damaging to the nails than Shellac. It stands for Builder in a Bottle. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...