Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Strange title I grant you but just came across this article talking about the extensive network of electric trolly buses which replaced the older network of electric trams 

https://metro.co.uk/2025/02/12/map-reveals-forgotten-london-trolleybus-network-big-tube-22538149/

Strikes me that we were better off,  pollution wise, with the old network of electric vehicles and only now are we returning to electric buses. 

Don't you just wish that the trams or trolly buses were kept and diesel buses were never introduced? 

Now it's too late as setting up a tram network is far too expensive compared to the relative cost if they maintained what they had. 

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/357709-why-are-we-so-short-sighted/
Share on other sites

Go to the London Transport Museum and check out the old tram, the buses of those days were far more comfortable and efficient.  Others argue that the fixed tracks did not provide the flexibility of bus routes, and was causing congestion as motor traffic increased on the roads.  Trams were dropped from almost every part of the UK during the 50s.

On the continent the road network is often extensive enough to maintain a tram network and/or planned economies ie Eastern Europe often led to extensive public transport networks.  Visit Budapest where all modes are nicely coordinated.

You will also find that most European cities that support a tram network are much smaller and more concentrated (and frequently flatter, but not Lisbon) than London, making such a network more viable, as does the Boulevard redevelopment of many cities with much wider main thoroughfaress allowing proper space for trams. 

1 hour ago, Penguin68 said:

The old trolley network had the disadvantage that the tracks could very easily 'capture' cycle wheels, leading to accidents. 

There was that risk with trams, bit trolly buses didn't need tracks.

As in all things, there has to be some self responsibility not to cycle along the tracks this avoiding the risk of getting captured. 

1 hour ago, Penguin68 said:

You will also find that most European cities that support a tram network are much smaller and more concentrated (and frequently flatter, but not Lisbon) than London, making such a network more viable, as does the Boulevard redevelopment of many cities with much wider main thoroughfaress allowing proper space for trams. 

As the old saying goes, size doesn't matter Frankfurt for example has an extensive tram network and it's about half the size of london but just as busy 

Edited by Spartacus
29 minutes ago, Spartacus said:

As the old saying goes, size doesn't matter Frankfurt for example has an extensive tram network and it's about half the size of london but just as busy 

That was my point, the smaller the city the more cost effective and useful a tram or trolley network is, London is too large and dispersed. 

10 minutes ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

There was a proposal for a cross river tram, running from Camden to Camberwell some years back. We obviously have a fairly extensive tram system running from Croydon to Wimbledon. 

It would have terminated in Peckham not Camberwell and was blocked by vocal locals both along the route and locally who didn't want a tram depot in Peckham (despite the good ot would bring) 

Such a shame it didn't happen 

  • Agree 1
On 14/02/2025 at 13:15, Spartacus said:

It would have terminated in Peckham not Camberwell and was blocked by vocal locals both along the route and locally who didn't want a tram depot in Peckham (despite the good ot would bring) 

Such a shame it didn't happen 

Wiki: 

The project was cancelled by then mayor of London Boris Johnsonin 2008 due to funding problems. A 2016 review of the CRT plan by subsequent mayor Sadiq Khan concluded that the CRT project would not be reopened at that time.[1]

 

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello.  A parcel for someone at 64B Blenheim Grove has been dumped at my address.  If anyone from 64B is in this forum, please get in touch!
    • CPR Dave is anti-dogs. Each to their own  I think my dog has perhaps grown a bit less nervy about the fireworks in the last few weeks, interestingly. Our last dog had no problems with them until he reached old age, when he became petrified.  CPR Dave - it's not just sounds of the metropolis they hate, mine collapses in fear when he hears thunder too 
    • There's quite a difference between going for a run around the footpaths and trying to sit quietly for an afternoon in a wide, grassy area and enjoying the peace & nature. The other two grassy areas in the park are used for sports, and both had barriered trackway running through them. The Parkrun had to be cancelled for at least three weeks, iirc. I'm concerned by your continued reference to "the rye" - the event is held in the park, not on the rye (common). There is a big difference, despite the organisers and council artificially amalgamating the whole area when trying to convince everyone that it's only a small area that is closed off. The railings & gates enclosing the park are a big clue...
    • So have you cancelled your contract with InPost / Yodel now? If so, that's probably caused hundreds of parcels to be stuck in limbo, as they've said to me before that they can't redirect them to a different store. I have a parcel that was refused by you twice, the last time on 5/12, and since then there's been no updates, despite me calling them 3 times. They just say it's being investigated, but if they now can't physically deliver to you then that is obviously the issue. So much for shopping for Christmas presents early, looks like I'll never get them now.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...