Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Penguin68 said:

And there are relatively few of these real beasts and a lot of sheep in wolf's clothing. By the way, 4 wheel drive is a positive safety issue, without it I couldn't have managed one of ED's hills the last time we had snow, passing a bus that had slid sideways. Just because 4WD is necessary for off roading etc. doesn't make it evil. It may be generally unnecessary on urban roads, but that just means it's an unnecessary cost to the purchaser. 

Most of the research I've seen broadly defines SUVs as including cross over vehicles.

There is no doubt that vehicles have got bigger, higher, and heavier, year on year in the UK. The semantics of what you call this trend for bigger vehicles is irrelevant; It is not a good one for road safety. And in built up areas it really is undesirable imo. 

4 minutes ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

Most of the research I've seen broadly defines SUVs as including cross over vehicles.

And that couldn't remotely mean that this research has an agenda possibly? Recognise that's not something in your normal vocabulary!

Here we go....

Look, if you think that bigger, heavier, higher fronted vehicles are no more dangerous than smaller ones, fill your boots. It's clearly not the case though. And there is plenty of research to prove it's not.

And putting safety to one side, it can't be sensible that half of new cars sold in the UK are too big to fit into the average parking space.

3 hours ago, Penguin68 said:

And there are relatively few of these real beasts and a lot of sheep in wolf's clothing. By the way, 4 wheel drive is a positive safety issue, without it I couldn't have managed one of ED's hills the last time we had snow, passing a bus that had slid sideways. Just because 4WD is necessary for off roading etc. doesn't make it evil. It may be generally unnecessary on urban roads, but that just means it's an unnecessary cost to the purchaser. 

I think I remember that year. Was that the time buses were all parked up in lines because they could not get up or down the hills either end of ED?

3 hours ago, Penguin68 said:

And there are relatively few of these real beasts and a lot of sheep in wolf's clothing. By the way, 4 wheel drive is a positive safety issue, without it I couldn't have managed one of ED's hills the last time we had snow, passing a bus that had slid sideways. Just because 4WD is necessary for off roading etc. doesn't make it evil. It may be generally unnecessary on urban roads, but that just means it's an unnecessary cost to the purchaser. 

How did you manage with two wheel drive all those years?  Traction control, ABS yes.  Four wheel drive - really?

I didn't, in an earlier snow episode I slid sideways down Sydenham Hill, it had been a sudden snow storm in the afternoon rush with no gritting. Luckily I didn't hit anything, and nothing hit me, but when I changed our my car and there was a suitable one available second hand with 4WD I snapped it up. My kids were in the car at the time and I didn't want a repeat with a less fortuitous outcome. 

To claim that 4WD is a necessary safety feature in London is laughable. Larger, heavier, higher fronted vehicles which easily mount verbs and pole through barriers are not safer in a built up area.

The fact that 4WD once allowed you to drive in snow and ice (when advice was not to), is not evidence that it’s the responsible choice 

55 minutes ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

The fact that 4WD once allowed you to drive in snow and ice (when advice was not to), is not evidence that it’s the responsible choice 

I was driving my children back when the snowstorm hit. Not forecast. And rather a spiteful, unpleasant and unthinking statement. I must just hope you're never caught in unexpected and unforecast poor weather. And how does anyone having 4WD hurt you? And the second occasion when I did have 4WD was again an unexpected event where I had to get people home. Certainly public transport wouldn't have helped then. 

So you are justifying 4 WD just in case a freak snow storm happens.  I've never experienced one of these in the UK.  The impact on environment, roads, pedestrian safety, use of resources doesn't matter?  If you are that worried about freak snow storms in the UK you are far better off with winter tyres, than four wheel drive.  I've driven plenty of times in Austria and Italy in the mountains with 2WD and winter tyres.

I've driven many times in the UK in snow with just 2WD, particularly when young living further North where we had regular snow.  In my younger days it was quite exciting. 

  • Agree 1
18 hours ago, Penguin68 said:

I was driving my children back when the snowstorm hit. Not forecast. And rather a spiteful, unpleasant and unthinking statement. I must just hope you're never caught in unexpected and unforecast poor weather. And how does anyone having 4WD hurt you? And the second occasion when I did have 4WD was again an unexpected event where I had to get people home. Certainly public transport wouldn't have helped then. 

An example of an exceptional occasion where you got stuck in an unforecasted snow storm (really?) is not evidence that a 4WD vehicle is important for ‘safety’ in London. 

SUVs and cross over vehicles are 8 times more likely to kill a child in a collision than a standard saloon car. You can make any choice you like, but don’t pretend it’s a safety issue in London. Look at what happened in Wimbledon. We don’t need off road vehicles in built up areas.

Edited by Earl Aelfheah

Malumbu said:

just in case a freak snow storm happens.  I've never experienced one of these in the UK"

Surprised you haven't experienced this ever in the UK? I have. I remember being caught out by unforecasted snow, falling so fast and thick there was near zero visibility. The weather conditions changed incredibly fast and lots of drivers caught out. It was also early evening, so dark. Many cars had to pull over; a number of them sliding around on the road too. It was incredibly scary.

More recently I have also been caught out by absolutely torrential rain (more akin to monsoon conditions) similarly unforcasted and also very difficult to drive in.

  • Like 1
6 minutes ago, first mate said:

More recently I have also been caught out by absolutely torrential rain (more akin to monsoon conditions) similarly unforcasted and also very difficult to drive in.

A 4WD is clearly essential in inner London due to … rain?

You can drive what you like, but come on. Let’s be serious.

I didn't say that; I was just commenting that like P68, I had also got caught out in a totally unexpected snowstorm, in this country. 

I think the snowstorm was around 2018; I wonder if that was the same year for you Penguin?

The torrential rain was much more recent but really unlike anything I have experienced in this country before. 

Edited by first mate

In 2010 we were hit with some extreme winter weather. I cycled through it as I did the last time this happened in 1991.  Bit daft as the office closed due to shortage of facilities and security staff.  All buses were cancelled as were most trains.  People whinged saying Russia and Scandinavia managed extreme winter weather so much better. But a senior  colleague said it would be clearly daft to spend 100s of millions on events that happened a few times each century.  That's the way some of you are coming across, justifying large vehicles just in case Krakatoa irrupts. Perhaps I should invest in a skidoo and ice skates for when the Thames next freezes over.

Edited by malumbu

If I know there is extreme weather coming up, personally I would try to avoid going out in it, although I know some people get a buzz taking risks. I think what is different about the weather events experienced by myself and P68 is the surprise element. I guess with climate change we can expect more unpredictability.

5 hours ago, first mate said:

If I know there is extreme weather coming up, personally I would try to avoid going out in it, although I know some people get a buzz taking risks. I think what is different about the weather events experienced by myself and P68 is the surprise element. I guess with climate change we can expect more unpredictability.

Yes, I agree. But I don't think this is an argument for needing bigger, heavier, higher fronted 4 wheel drive vehicles across London (which seems to be what you're implying?). 

It's more than a little ironic to suggest the answer to climate change is more SUVs and cross over vehicles.

Edited by Earl Aelfheah

I may have misinterpreted but I felt doubt was being cast on P68 saying that they had experienced an extreme unforeseen weather event. I was simply saying I had also had this experience and not just with snow but also rain. Both times I was really nervous driving and nearly had to pull over, especially the snowstorm at night. So I was posting about that.

Glad we can agree weather unpredictability may be on the rise.

  • 2 weeks later...

Small EVs should be the future in metropolitan areas.  The first EV I drove was a Leaf.  It was wonderful.  Only surpassed by the first time I went on electrically assisted pedal cycle.  Around the same time I test drove a Tessla model X or S, around the dealership in Shepherds Bush.  That was just silly, totally unneeded in the urban environment.

But as I pointed out elsewhere, how has much of the industry responded?  By developing large SUV variants.  Shame on them.

19 minutes ago, malumbu said:

But as I pointed out elsewhere, how has much of the industry responded?  By developing large SUV variants.  Shame on them.

Which the customers apparently wanted. Your 'the customer is always wrong' mindset, if typical, may suggest the reason why the UK is currently in such a financial mess. Allowing the customer only to have what they don't want doesn't seem to me a highway to growth.

They've been sold a dream, a lifestyle dream.  Not one person owning/running a SUV has posted on this thread to say why they love them.  I wager whichever side of this debate you are on, you don't have one.

Don't be naive to believe that the manufacturers of virtually any product are not trying to get you to upsale/upscale/gold plate etc, that's how they make the greatest profit

In the days before Top Gear got silly, they did an excellent programme on the ideal city car, comparing the main models on sale, and finishing with a line of Fiat 500s, as this ticked all the boxes.

2 minutes ago, malumbu said:

I wager whichever side of this debate you are on, you don't have one

Wrong, but a car body type not a truck body type one, So much like most of the others pilloried as SUV owners. Also it's a hybrid.

But I don't have the luxury of having a city car to go with my car, I'm afraid, as I don't just use it in the city.

Edited by Penguin68

This comment is illuminating 🫤...

"It is the industry that has driven the demand through huge marketing and advertising campaigns in recent years," said Dudley Curtis, the communications manager at the European Transport Safety Council.

"SUVs offered the industry a simple way of charging more for a vehicle that does the same thing [as others]," he said.

  • Agree 1
  • 2 weeks later...

Fundamentally, ever bigger, heavier, higher fronted, off road vehicles should not be welcomed in a built up area. We should insist on stricter safety standards / regulation. It isn't that long ago that we laughed at US drivers for taking these ridiculous vehicles everywhere, inevitably, car companies have managed to sell the same damaging illusion of SUVs as offering 'freedom' to many in the UK. 

Edited by Earl Aelfheah
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...