Jump to content

Experienced A Level Chemistry Tutor


Recommended Posts

Chemistry with Chloe

Expert Chemistry Tuition That Builds Confidence and Delivers Results

1-to-1 and small group support for GCSE and A-Level students who want to feel clear, capable, and exam-ready in Chemistry.

Your child wants to do well in Chemistry - whether that means aiming for a top grade, keeping up in class, or preparing for medicine or science at university.

But Chemistry is complex, and it’s easy to fall behind or lose confidence, even with natural ability.

Many students find Chemistry overwhelming:

  • The concepts feel abstract and fast-paced.
  • Exam technique and mark schemes can be confusing.
  • One missed topic can create a domino effect of gaps.

I’m Chloe, a Chemistry teacher with over 20 years of experience teaching in some of the UK’s top independent schools.

I studied Biochemistry at Oxford and have helped hundreds of students achieve excellent Chemistry results at both GCSE and A-Level.

I bring:

  • 🌿 A calm, encouraging approach that builds confidence.
  • 📘 A deep understanding of what examiners are looking for.
  • 🎓 Insight into university admissions, especially for medicine and Oxbridge.

I’d love to help your child thrive.

Here’s how we can get started:

Step 1 – Book a free 15-minute call

We’ll talk about your child’s needs and goals.

Step 2 – Choose the right support

You’ll have the option of one-to-one tuition or joining a small, focused group (max 6 students) tailored by level and exam board.

Step 3 – Watch their confidence grow

With weekly support, your child will gain clarity, boost exam technique, and feel more in control of their learning.

Without the right support, even capable students can feel lost or disheartened in Chemistry.

Falling behind in one topic often snowballs, and stress builds as exams approach.

With the right tutor and structured support, your child can:

  • Master tricky topics like bonding, energetics, or organic mechanisms
  • Learn how to structure high-scoring exam answers
  • Walk into their exams calm, confident, and prepared

I’d love to help your child achieve the same.

🧪 Why Chemistry with Chloe?

  • 🌟 20+ years’ teaching experience in top UK schools
  • 🧪 Specialist in AQA, OCR, Edexcel GCSE and A-Level Chemistry
  • 🎯 Track record of helping students go from Cs and Ds to As and A*s
  • 💬 Personalised feedback every week
  • 💻 Flexible, high-quality online sessions from the comfort of your home.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • But actually, replacing council housing, or more accurately adding to housing stock and doing so via expanding council estates was precisely what we should have been doing, financed by selling off old housing stock. As the population grows adding to housing built by councils is surely the right thing to do, and financing it through sales is a good model, it's the one commercial house builders follow for instance. In the end the issue is about having the right volumes of the appropriate sort of housing to meet national needs. Thatcher stopped that by forbidding councils to use sales revenues to increase housing stock. That was the error. 
    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...