Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Our Barry Road house buidings insurance has just DOUBLED due to new Surface Water Flood Risk Assessment Maps from the GLA or Southwark Council or HM Govt DEFRA Dept Environment.

Insurers are refusing cover or creaming off huge premium rises hidden behind “global warming” & “climate change” & “mitigation measures”.

With all new techy charts, maps, reports, diagrams, they just demand 40% extra payment with zero ecidence and wrong data, quoting scientific sounding reports & maps & charts which they quote wrongly.  

 Navigating the between the Southwark Council, the GLA, DERA, the Financial Ombudsman and insurance is a nightmare. It’s so convoluted, remote, uncontactable and factually wrong that it amounts to 21st C PROTECTION RACKET.

Suggestions please or support, to know more, full story + contacts+ organise.

Contact SantaClaus

Maybe point them to the extensive flood alleviation works the council has just spent a fortune installing in the park next to Barry Road?

Copy in the council so they can provide evidence of the efficacy of the scheme they purchased for us .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am trying to find out about people's experiences of the 4+ and 7+ assessments. I am a teacher and have a wealth of experience tutoring for theses assessments (including my own son), but it's always good to keep on top of things as they always make tweaks to them. TIA! 
    • "Sep, you don't even live here."   ???
    • "You have no idea why"   To be fair Sue, it's blindingly obvious to anyone who has a conversation with anyone who isn't a Corbyn supporter. And even some who liked Corbyn (like me initially) found him somewhat flaky even at his most popular But let's say you are right and I have NO idea why anybody might not vote for him. They still didn't vote for him. He lost two elections. The second one badly (and strongly predicted but the stubborn old goat wouldn't budge so we we were stuck with Johnson and another 3 million PMs in the 5 years that followed) So even with ZERO evidence, we have our eyes and ears and brains But we do have evidence   https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/27022-their-own-words-why-voters-abandoned-labour
    • As I said, it was my understanding. I worded it very carefully. I didn't/don't know for sure, so clearly not a fact. And hardly an "opinion", which is something completely different. You have no idea what reason anybody might have had for not voting for him (unless you can point to some opinion poll results which actually asked people?)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...