Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Saw this today about Southwark voting in support of a tourist tax in the borough 

BBC News - Tourist tax visitor levy comes closer in Southwark

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ypvw0qln7o

Makes me wonder what else they can find to tax, maybe a fine for breaking wind, or breathing or even a tax on windows. Of course I am being facetious but it does feel like if it moves, they will tax it. 

Edited by Spartacus
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/
Share on other sites

I think it's a good idea and follows the example of other towns/areas. As it says in the article, the area around the main tourist attractions in Southwark, that is The Globe, Southwark Cathedral, Tate Modern and the whole walking route from London Bridge to Blackfriars, takes a lot of maintaining and it shouldn't be a burden on regular council tax payers like us. 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714256
Share on other sites

On 20/07/2025 at 08:45, Jenijenjen said:

I think it's a good idea and follows the example of other towns/areas. As it says in the article, the area around the main tourist attractions in Southwark, that is The Globe, Southwark Cathedral, Tate Modern and the whole walking route from London Bridge to Blackfriars, takes a lot of maintaining and it shouldn't be a burden on regular council tax payers like us. 

Whilst I agree to some extent,  are they going to have some kind of checkpoint? 

I can't see how this could work in practice.

Surely Southwark residents go to these places quite frequently as well, particularly Tate Modern? 

Will we have to take proof of residency every time we go out? What happens when family are with us who don't live in Southwark?

Will other London boroughs start doing the same thing?

Will Southwark residents be charged a tourist tax to visit "tourist attractions" in other areas, eg the V&A and the British Museum?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714409
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Sue said:

Whilst I agree to some extent,  are they going to have some kind of checkpoint? 

I can't see how this could work in practice.

Surely Southwark residents go to these places quite frequently as well, particularly Tate Modern? 

Will we have to take proof of residency every time we go out? What happens when family are with us who don't live in Southwark?

Will other London boroughs start doing the same thing?

Will Southwark residents be charged a tourist tax to visit "tourist attractions" in other areas, eg the V&A and the British Museum?

It doesn't work like that. There won't be differential pricing for tourists and residents at any attractions, no checkpoints nor a requirement to carry one's papers with one at all times.

A levy is put on hotels, maybe on Air B&Bs, on a bed per night basis. That cash goes to Southwark. It's pretty easy to administer.

Edited by David Peckham
Clarity
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714414
Share on other sites

In  parts of Europe you just get charged tax at the end of your stay somewhere. Usually a couple of quid added to your bill. Most tourists are pretty happy to stump up the cost, as it's an expected expense. 

I  think it's a good way to make money and remove the burden from locals. 

It's for foreigners, Sue - I'm sure Londoners and brits will still be able to freely cross the borough lines without having to go through checkpoint charlie 🙂 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714415
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sue said:

Whilst I agree to some extent,  are they going to have some kind of checkpoint? 

I can't see how this could work in practice.

 

It’s a flat fee levy payable by guests staying in hotel and hostel rooms, so added to the bill.  This already happens in Manchester and Liverpool ( I think in Liverpool it’s a percentage, so the more expensive rooms pay more). I read somewhere that Edinburgh is doing this next year?

Charges of this kind are becoming common around the world. I think it absolutely makes sense for Southwark and other boroughs are bound to follow.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714416
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Insuflo said:

It’s a flat fee levy payable by guests staying in hotel and hostel rooms, so added to the bill.  This already happens in Manchester and Liverpool ( I think in Liverpool it’s a percentage, so the more expensive rooms pay more). I read somewhere that Edinburgh is doing this next year?

Charges of this kind are becoming common around the world. I think it absolutely makes sense for Southwark and other boroughs are bound to follow.

So it's for tourists and others actually staying in Southwark?

So a person living and working  in England but staying in a hotel in  Southwark for work purposes (say) would have to pay this tax (or their employer would)?

But a tourist from France (say),  staying in a hotel outside Southwark but visiting all the Southwark "tourist attractions" wouldn't?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714447
Share on other sites

Pretty much, Sue, yeah.

It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it. 

The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs.

As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you.

So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really.

This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.

 

2 hours ago, maddison said:

I think we should open up more american sweet shops and Union Jack branded gift shops

'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now.

If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways.

Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.

 

Kind Regards 

Dave

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714462
Share on other sites

Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists.

So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy. 

The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough. 

It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs. 

https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714463
Share on other sites

Do none of you go abroad.  Tourist taxes are really common in continental Europe and do vary a lot city by city.

They are collected by the hotels/rental apartments.

They are usually a  tiny part of your holiday costs.  In Narbonne recently we paid €1.30 per person per night.  The next town we went to charge 80 cents per person per night.

By comparison Cologne is 5% of your accomodation.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714464
Share on other sites

If anyone is thinking of traveling a bit more and would like to supplement their trip by picking up a few family heirlooms from various ailing maiden aunts of mine, please drop me a private message.

I'm particularly interested in anyone who is considering Colombia & Bolivia, The Golden Triangle region of South East Asia, Andalusia & North Africa or Rotterdam.

And Liverpool.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714466
Share on other sites

I'd get rid of duty free shopping.  Nothing to do with tourist tax but something I hate.  All that glitz as you try to get through to Wetherspoons in the departure lounge.  No great savings over on line or even at times supermarkets, and the hypocrisy of selling cheap cancer sticks.

Ok back to tourist tax

 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714467
Share on other sites

Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions.

Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714599
Share on other sites

On 21/07/2025 at 16:43, malumbu said:

I'd get rid of duty free shopping.  Nothing to do with tourist tax but something I hate.  All that glitz as you try to get through to Wetherspoons in the departure lounge.  No great savings over on line or even at times supermarkets, and the hypocrisy of selling cheap cancer sticks.

Ok back to tourist tax

 

To be fair, anything which waylays someone on their way to Palma Nova or Lloret de Mar from spending even more pre-flight time in Spoon's surely has some merit?

I think losing a few quid on a litre of Bacardi and 200 Benson & Hedges Gold seems a reasonable price for society to pay.

,

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714674
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's actually why the Sherlock Holmes stories were so popular. There was so little crime people found it exciting to imagine robberies and murders happening in London.
    • Yes, because of course there were no violent robberies in the olden days. Pretty much no crime happened at all I believe through the entire Victorian era.
    • Hi all, Im a Southwark council leaseholder and live downstairs in a ground floor flat, there is one flat above me, it's a house with individual front doors leading from the street into the shared pathway. My neighbour told me he has had a ring doorbell installed, no discussion as to how I would feel being on camera everytime I go in and out or in my front garden. I was told it's only for deliveries and doesn't record and only activates when pressed, however I don't know this and I feel really uncomfortable everytime I'm out in garden or on doorstep talking to people. Everytime I walk in/out, it lights up and in the eve it has a  infra red  light. Now I've read up that as he said its only for deliveries, he could set it so it only activates when pressed, however it activates with its motion sensor. Had he said to me about getting it installed, I could have had the opportunity to ask about it recording etc but nothing except it's being installed and when I arrived home it was there. I don't like being horrible to people however I feel I have not been considered in his decision and I feel very uncomfortable as, some times I have to stand on doorstep to get signal for my mobile and I really don't like the idea of being watched and listened to. Has anyone got any advice as I'm beginning to get angry as I've asked about it once and was told it only activates when pressed. I believe this is not true. I know southwark council say you need to ask permission to make sure the neighbours are OK with it, I don't really want to go down that road but I don't know how to approach the subject again. They also put a shed approx 3 foot from my back room window, these places are built so my window faces their rear garden and there upstairs window  faces mine. They said it's there temporarily, that was over a year ago and it does affect the light, plus I'm hoping to sell up soon and the view from window is mainly a dark brown shed. When I've mentioned this, I was told they have no where else to put it, whereas originally they said its only temporary, Also the floorboards above are bare and I get woke early morning and at night, the thudding is so bad my light shakes and window rattles, so I mentioned this and asked if they have rugs, I was told when they get the boards re sanded they will get rugs, I should have asked if they could get rugs and just take them up when boards being done, which I would have done had it been me living above someone, their attitude was I can just put up with it until they are ready. so they had the floor boards done, and the workmen was hammering screws, yes screws, in the floorboards, I spoke to workmen to ask how much longer and they said yes, are using screws to make less noise! I could hear the cordless screwdriver, not an issue but for every screw there were at least 8 whacks, the owners had gone out to avoid the noise  so I  spoke to workmen as the noise was unbearable, the sanding, not an issue at all, people need to get things done to their home and I'm fine that on occasions there will be temporary noise. now I have a nice crack on my bedroom ceiling, I mentioned this to owner but no response, he said there were alot of loose floorboards and it will be much better now, not so noisy, as though I don't know the difference between squeaking floor boards and thudding, and nothing was mentioned re the crack or that they now have rugs, which if it were me, I'd be trying to resolve the issue so we can get on with feeling happy in our homes. so I'm feeling it's a total lack of consideration. these places are old and Edwardian and I've lived here over 40 years, had 4 different neighbours and it's only now the noise of thudding is really bad and the people before had floorboards but nothing like this. As you can probably tell I'm really wound up and I don't want to end up exploding at them, I've always got on with neighbours and always said if there's a problem with my dog, pls let me know, always tell me, however I feel it's got to the point where I say something and I'm fobbed off. I know I should tell them but I'm angry, perhaps I should write them a letter. Any suggestions greatly appreciated and thank you for reading my rant. 
    • Sadly, the price we now all pay for becoming a soft apologetic society.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...