Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Saw this today about Southwark voting in support of a tourist tax in the borough 

BBC News - Tourist tax visitor levy comes closer in Southwark

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c5ypvw0qln7o

Makes me wonder what else they can find to tax, maybe a fine for breaking wind, or breathing or even a tax on windows. Of course I am being facetious but it does feel like if it moves, they will tax it. 

Edited by Spartacus
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/
Share on other sites

I think it's a good idea and follows the example of other towns/areas. As it says in the article, the area around the main tourist attractions in Southwark, that is The Globe, Southwark Cathedral, Tate Modern and the whole walking route from London Bridge to Blackfriars, takes a lot of maintaining and it shouldn't be a burden on regular council tax payers like us. 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714256
Share on other sites

On 20/07/2025 at 08:45, Jenijenjen said:

I think it's a good idea and follows the example of other towns/areas. As it says in the article, the area around the main tourist attractions in Southwark, that is The Globe, Southwark Cathedral, Tate Modern and the whole walking route from London Bridge to Blackfriars, takes a lot of maintaining and it shouldn't be a burden on regular council tax payers like us. 

Whilst I agree to some extent,  are they going to have some kind of checkpoint? 

I can't see how this could work in practice.

Surely Southwark residents go to these places quite frequently as well, particularly Tate Modern? 

Will we have to take proof of residency every time we go out? What happens when family are with us who don't live in Southwark?

Will other London boroughs start doing the same thing?

Will Southwark residents be charged a tourist tax to visit "tourist attractions" in other areas, eg the V&A and the British Museum?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714409
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Sue said:

Whilst I agree to some extent,  are they going to have some kind of checkpoint? 

I can't see how this could work in practice.

Surely Southwark residents go to these places quite frequently as well, particularly Tate Modern? 

Will we have to take proof of residency every time we go out? What happens when family are with us who don't live in Southwark?

Will other London boroughs start doing the same thing?

Will Southwark residents be charged a tourist tax to visit "tourist attractions" in other areas, eg the V&A and the British Museum?

It doesn't work like that. There won't be differential pricing for tourists and residents at any attractions, no checkpoints nor a requirement to carry one's papers with one at all times.

A levy is put on hotels, maybe on Air B&Bs, on a bed per night basis. That cash goes to Southwark. It's pretty easy to administer.

Edited by David Peckham
Clarity
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714414
Share on other sites

In  parts of Europe you just get charged tax at the end of your stay somewhere. Usually a couple of quid added to your bill. Most tourists are pretty happy to stump up the cost, as it's an expected expense. 

I  think it's a good way to make money and remove the burden from locals. 

It's for foreigners, Sue - I'm sure Londoners and brits will still be able to freely cross the borough lines without having to go through checkpoint charlie 🙂 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714415
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sue said:

Whilst I agree to some extent,  are they going to have some kind of checkpoint? 

I can't see how this could work in practice.

 

It’s a flat fee levy payable by guests staying in hotel and hostel rooms, so added to the bill.  This already happens in Manchester and Liverpool ( I think in Liverpool it’s a percentage, so the more expensive rooms pay more). I read somewhere that Edinburgh is doing this next year?

Charges of this kind are becoming common around the world. I think it absolutely makes sense for Southwark and other boroughs are bound to follow.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714416
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Insuflo said:

It’s a flat fee levy payable by guests staying in hotel and hostel rooms, so added to the bill.  This already happens in Manchester and Liverpool ( I think in Liverpool it’s a percentage, so the more expensive rooms pay more). I read somewhere that Edinburgh is doing this next year?

Charges of this kind are becoming common around the world. I think it absolutely makes sense for Southwark and other boroughs are bound to follow.

So it's for tourists and others actually staying in Southwark?

So a person living and working  in England but staying in a hotel in  Southwark for work purposes (say) would have to pay this tax (or their employer would)?

But a tourist from France (say),  staying in a hotel outside Southwark but visiting all the Southwark "tourist attractions" wouldn't?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714447
Share on other sites

Pretty much, Sue, yeah.

It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it. 

The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs.

As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you.

So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really.

This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.

 

2 hours ago, maddison said:

I think we should open up more american sweet shops and Union Jack branded gift shops

'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now.

If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways.

Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.

 

Kind Regards 

Dave

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714462
Share on other sites

Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists.

So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy. 

The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough. 

It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs. 

https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/

  • Agree 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714463
Share on other sites

Do none of you go abroad.  Tourist taxes are really common in continental Europe and do vary a lot city by city.

They are collected by the hotels/rental apartments.

They are usually a  tiny part of your holiday costs.  In Narbonne recently we paid €1.30 per person per night.  The next town we went to charge 80 cents per person per night.

By comparison Cologne is 5% of your accomodation.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714464
Share on other sites

If anyone is thinking of traveling a bit more and would like to supplement their trip by picking up a few family heirlooms from various ailing maiden aunts of mine, please drop me a private message.

I'm particularly interested in anyone who is considering Colombia & Bolivia, The Golden Triangle region of South East Asia, Andalusia & North Africa or Rotterdam.

And Liverpool.

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714466
Share on other sites

I'd get rid of duty free shopping.  Nothing to do with tourist tax but something I hate.  All that glitz as you try to get through to Wetherspoons in the departure lounge.  No great savings over on line or even at times supermarkets, and the hypocrisy of selling cheap cancer sticks.

Ok back to tourist tax

 

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714467
Share on other sites

Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions.

Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714599
Share on other sites

On 21/07/2025 at 16:43, malumbu said:

I'd get rid of duty free shopping.  Nothing to do with tourist tax but something I hate.  All that glitz as you try to get through to Wetherspoons in the departure lounge.  No great savings over on line or even at times supermarkets, and the hypocrisy of selling cheap cancer sticks.

Ok back to tourist tax

 

To be fair, anything which waylays someone on their way to Palma Nova or Lloret de Mar from spending even more pre-flight time in Spoon's surely has some merit?

I think losing a few quid on a litre of Bacardi and 200 Benson & Hedges Gold seems a reasonable price for society to pay.

,

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/364609-taxes/#findComment-1714674
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
    • Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...