Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DogLost Logo
Login
Search:
 

Lost: Coco, Mastiff, Male, in South East (SE21) 199549

Alerts Sent: 150
Click to See How You Can Help
Views: 32
Coco - Poster Image
Poster Image
Coco - Extra Image
Extra Image
Name:Coco
Dog ID:199549
Gender:Male
Breed:Mastiff
Age:Young / Puppy
Colour:Brown
Marks/Scars:white chest, also small white mark on the top his back
Special Conditions:None
Microchip:Yes
Date Lost:13 Aug 2025
Where Lost:94 clive road
Postcode:
SE21Show on map
Town/County:London, Greater London
Region:South East
Other Info:
Not specified
Created:13 Aug 2025
Listed by:luis
View PosterDownload Poster
ShareTweetPinEmailShare
Coco - Poster Image
Poster Image
Coco - Extra Image
Extra Image
Sightings and Information
Please post if you have more about this dog. Log in above or register to leave comments or to like them.
Please note that DogLost cannot be held responsible for the content of any other sites mentioned or linked to here.
13-08-2025 11:48Jayne - Founder Doglost.
DOG LOST
PawPawPawPaw

Local members alerted.

13-08-2025 11:27DogLost System
 
PawPaw

Sorry to see that "Coco" is missing.

• If your dog is microchipped please let the microchip company know that your dog is missing and check that all details are up to date.

• Owners targeted by a malicious hoaxer demanding money for the return of their dog should phone the police on 101 immediately and contact [email protected]

• A photograph of your dog is essential for the website. If you have not already uploaded one, please do so by Logging in and My Dogs. Alternatively you can email it to [email protected] quoting the dog's DogLost ID number: 199549

• Obtain a missing poster by clicking on View poster above. Posters are very important so start postering now!

• You will need to be logged in to upload photos, edit your dog's details, or add comments. You can add comments by clicking on Click here to add a comment.

• Contact dog wardens, vets and local rescue centres, and in Scotland, the Police. Give a detailed description with any distinguishing marks/scars or send them a copy of your DogLost poster. You can find vets in your area here.

• If your dog has been stolen inform the police immediately and obtain a crime reference number (CRN). Send an email to [email protected].

• If your dog is picked up and taken to rescue kennels, it can be legally re-homed after seven days. Visit rescue centres in person and do not rely on checking by phone alone. Other people may not recognise your dog by your description, so give them a DogLost poster.

• Keep us updated by keeping your dog's page up to date and check for posts from helpers who may have suggestions and possible matches or sightings

• DogLost is free and anyone asking for money to find or return your dog is not volunteering for us. If you are concerned about an approach you have received, please email [email protected]

 
Reuniting Dogs with their Owners
© 2025 DogLost
Edited by Mystic Mog
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/365662-lost-dog-now-found%F0%9F%98%80/
Share on other sites

  • Mystic Mog changed the title to Lost dog. Now found😀

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Its crazy, they raise membership prices due to the refurb but things are worse than before.
    • That example seems fair enough - but wouldn’t say it’s completely analogous to the Trump situation the STORY (your caps) is about the bbc edit precisely because of what happened that day and people’s ability to brush it under the carpet. I think the edit didn’t  need to be done in that way to make the exact same point. So it’s wrong thing to do, but it isn’t actually incorrect in its point - and people should be reexamining the events and not the edit  and I don’t think it’s political to say or do this. If your supporter example played out that way then fair enough - I just cannot agree that in this case the edit fundamentally changes what he said, meant or did  - especially without events transpired   It could definitely be made more explicit but given what actually happened… ? At least hopefully at this point we are being less aggy with each other and trying to make our points 
    • But THE STORY is about a BBC edit, and its impartiality issues, not about the storming of the capital. And it's not the first time deceitful editing has been a story - there was the whole Queen scandal too.  I love the BBC and hate seeing the corporation frankly unable to remain impartial anymore. It breaks my heart, because we do have a higher standard in this country and that's what keeps us on the right side of history - not people like Trump.  A long time ago I made a film about a Trump supporter. I came into the edit one day and the editor and edited him to say something quite bigoted, which he simply never said. Luckily I spotted it. The editor's excuse was 'well it's the kind of thing he would say'. I made him take it out, because it was dishonest and you have to leave your politics at the door if you want to be a good documentarian. 
    • Showers are still cold today.  When I asked at Reception, I was told that one of the boilers was now repaired and they were just waiting for the water to warm up!  The pool was pretty cold today as well,  Still a load of grit /dirt on the bottom, seems to be getting worse.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...