Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That’s what academies do spend money on things that do not directly relate to the education of the children. 
In fact, in this case, I think it would be detrimental - don’t plants reduce CO2 and a school on a busy road needs to maximise that benefit not reduce it

  • Like 2
3 hours ago, alice said:

That’s what academies do spend money on things that do not directly relate to the education of the children. 
In fact, in this case, I think it would be detrimental - don’t plants reduce CO2 and a school on a busy road needs to maximise that benefit not reduce it

But without knowing why they were removed, I don't see how we can comment.

Does anybody know the reason?

6 hours ago, Angelina said:

Thanks for your help googling the council responsibilities and being patronising. How lovely of you.

That's certainly cleared up the matter.

 

 I thought Malumbu's post was useful information, given the subject matter of this thread 

I didn't think it was patronising.

  • Agree 1

Thanks @Sue

Here is the comment I responded to:

"let's have blind faith in our council doing the right thing, with the right considerations for environment, for wildlife and for conservation, or let's not and expect them to be transparent and accountable" 

My point is that you need to let people get on with their responsibilities.  That there are qualified people who are experts in their profession. And if you have an issue contact your ward Councilor.  That is the democratic process.

I did not comment about Dog Kennel Hill School.  But if I was unhappy I would complain to them before going on social media.

Edited by malumbu
  • Like 1
11 hours ago, malumbu said:

 

I did not comment about Dog Kennel Hill School.  But if I was unhappy I would complain to them before going on social media.

Yes, it would seem sensible to at least find out the reason for the removal. For all we know the school may intend to replace them with other planting.

Complaining anywhere seems a bit premature at this point, I would have thought.

Well, I do stand by my point that sometimes academies can be seen to spend money that does not directly impact the education of  children., removing trees or bushes is one such thing. Maybe they intend to replace them with something far superior but this is all money that could be spent elsewhere that actually benefits learning. 
edit:  of course if they have been removed because they contain poisonous berries that may result in the death of a child I bow my head and apologise. 

Edited by alice
On 27/08/2025 at 19:22, malumbu said:

Perhaps just let them get on with their job, their profession?

Although I expect there are a number of experts on this forum who may wish to apply for an aboricultural officer post

https://jobs.southwark.gov.uk/jobs/arboricultural-officer-sc07537

No no and no.  Community activism (or even just caring) is NOT about keeping you head down, minding your business, and assuming there are Mensa-level experts making infallible decisions based on impeccable advice and in perfect sympathy and harmony with public sentiment. Especially when it's with our money and impacts green space, no matter how trivial it might seem.

The council cuts down way too many trees and never replaces them, there's no urban canopy, trees on my road especially are trimmed to within an inch of their lives so people can send an invoice.

Southwark has a full time tree removal person but no green regeneration person around street trees in particular.  It's like having 25 morgue workers in a hospital but no midwife.  Best gift you can give anyone for the future is to plant a tree today.

  • Agree 4

Two large trees on Landells between Goodrich and Silvester were to have been removed last week, according to signs (insurance) on both, but they’re still there. Southwark has replaced trees in the past when older/diseased/hazardous ones were removed so I expect new ones will be planted eventually. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Look at the national debt of the US.  It's ginormous.  The US spent their way out of the 1930s depression. Which is what the UK should have done rather than the Coalition's austerity. Look at the harm and division austerity led to in the UK. If only it was simple.
    • Floating a few ideas to gauge consensus indicates that there is no strategic plan.  It's just political dithering. It represents a fundamental inability to recognise the fundamental structural  issues concerning the nations economy. In keeping with France, Germany and many other European countries, the UK's economic health is in decline. In the last two decades, much of government spending has been funded by debt.  The cost of servicing that debt is currently running at around £95 billion and that is increasing steadily. It means we are living beyond our means. We are in a debt spiral. the government is funding a welfare state that has gone out of control. We cannot continue to have a situation where millions here prefer to live off Universal Credit  plus other benefits. Some of them also earn additional untaxed income from the grey economy. We have to reduce govt spending. It is the elephant in the room. There has to be cutbacks - no tinkering but real cutbacks  and austerity. Committing to austerity and  major cutbacks will reestablish credibility in the financial markets. This alone will reduce the cost of servicing the national debt. It's a virtual circle but it does need political courage not indecisiveness. Stop rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.!  
    • @malumbu I don't know the answer either but I do know that floating multiple ideas leads to uncertainty and spooks the economy.  If they want to grow it, they should be more cautious about what they say as they are currently in danger of digging the financial black hole deeper as markets and investors will be wary. 
    • https://www.southwark.gov.uk/news/2024/southwark-becomes-first-inner-london-borough-have-100000-trees Link to Southwark Council's ambulance tree planting programme.  Rather good wouldn't you say?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...