Jump to content

Dinner service - China & Cutlery: 40p per piece


SteveSE23

Recommended Posts

We've advertised this before but as quite a few pieces have now gone, here's an updated list:

 

We're moving overseas and are selling goods that we can't take with us:

As caterers, we have lots of kitchen/service equipment that we're selling: 

We used this china and cutlery at formal dinners and for hospitality. It's in good condition and we're offering it very cheaply (40p per piece), with a minimum purchase of 15 x pieces (of any shape/size - sorry but at these prices, we can't spend time dealing with enquiries/sales of just a couple of items). 

The china is all from the same factory. They changed the name twice, hence the reason you'll see different backstamps, but it's all the same pattern (Harmony Bistro). A quick search on eBay will show that some people are ambitiously trying to sell a single cup and saucer for over £15!

The cutlery is stainless steel and by Judge (Windsor pattern). Some is marked 'Stellar'. Both are identical and both ultimately manufactured by Horwood Homewares.

Below is our current stock list. We'll update it whenever large quantities are sold, so check for comments below:

CHINA

  60 x dinner plates (27cm)

  25 x starter/dessert plates (21cm)

  30 x starter/dessert plates (19.5cm)

  25 x side plates (17cm)

  15 x tea cups 

  15 x tea saucers

  28 x large coffee cups (no saucer)

 

CUTLERY

260 x side/starter knives

120 x starter/dessert forks

80 x dinner knives

  40 x dinner forks

  10 x soup spoons

  40 x dessert spoons

  16 x tea spoons

 

40p per piece

* Please note, the minimum spend is £6. 

Cash on collection from SE23

 

Steve & Meg

PlaceSetting_01.jpg

Cutlery_01.jpg

China_02.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...