Available: two double bedrooms in lovely, quiet townhouse in Denmark Hill/E Dulwich

By PeterW
August 25, 2025 in Property

Recommended Posts

PeterW

Posted August 25, 2025

- Share

Posted August 25, 2025

£1,000pcm per room including some bills.

Available from 7 Sept, or potentially a bit earlier: two double rooms on the top floor of a lovely townhouse on a very quiet, green cul de sac almost equidistant between E Dulwich and Denmark Hill. I currently rent the place, but I'm moving out and my very nice lodger, David, is taking over the lease.

He has a bedroom and shower room on the ground floor. On the first floor there's a light-filled kitchen/living room/dining room, and on the top floor there are two double bedrooms, one single bedroom and a bathroom. The two double rooms are the ones being rented. The small single won't be - it can be used as a room for guests or office space, depending on need.

The house has a small private rear garden which leads onto a very big communal garden. It has a built-in garage, perfect for bikes or other storage.

I've attached a few pics. It really is one of the nicest places I've ever lived - very quiet and green.

David is in his 40s, has a small, very sweet-natured dog, and is a working professional, so the house will suit people who are perhaps slightly older, or at least not noisy party animals. He's looking for two individual renters - no couples, I'm afraid.

He does't have an EDW account so I'm helping him out. Message me if you're interested and I can put him in touch.

Link to comment

https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/366182-available-two-double-bedrooms-in-lovely-quiet-townhouse-in-denmark-hille-dulwich/

Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

Advertise Here
Latest Discussions
- Any updates? - Sidings East Dulwich on the top of Railway rise
  
  By Jenijenjen · Posted 44 minutes ago
  
  Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
- Any updates? - Sidings East Dulwich on the top of Railway rise
  
  By Penguin68 · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves.
- roof repairs and guarantees
  
  By tropica · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof.
- roof repairs and guarantees
  
  By Dulwichlass · Posted 1 hour ago
  
  Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything.

Sign In