Jump to content

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Earl Aelfheah said:

You're doing a great job of challenging the stereotype of 'raise the colours' supporters there 'Cheeky'. 

oh iII be fIying high n proud on the 13th . anyway simp i got things to do . now you can rant on with mr diabetes  

Saint-George-and-the-Dragon-John-Fastolf.webp

1 hour ago, Insuflo said:

Ooh, Cheeky! Why do they call you Cheeky? Is it your resemblance to an arse?

sweet dreams mr diabetes

A quick Google search shows that that image comes from a French book of hours of the 15th century. So, that’s a page of a French book, written in Latin. From 600 years ago. Quite what that has to do with contemporary British discourse, is open to interpretation.

What is not open to interpretation is the character of those gathered outside hotels of late. They are of the same character as Mr. Cheeky.

  • Like 3
  • Agree 1
4 minutes ago, Insuflo said:

A quick Google search shows that that image comes from a French book of hours of the 15th century. So, that’s a page of a French book, written in Latin. From 600 years ago. Quite what that has to do with contemporary British discourse, is open to interpretation.

What is not open to interpretation is the character of those gathered outside hotels of late. They are of the same character as Mr. Cheeky.

Thank you for the compIiment mr diabetes iII Iet them know when i speak to em 

Just now, Insuflo said:

I’m bemused by the diabetes references. 

your bemused by many things  cuck. anyway im out some of us have jobs to get up for in the morning. we dont AII sit around in mummys basement being ungratefuI for the benefits you ponce off the state. keep safe have a good evening onIine 🐱

58 minutes ago, LordshipPain said:

The Labour astro-turfers are out in force on this thread aren't they!

 

this doesn't mean anything - it's a word salad with no reference to the topic at hand. And given the video I posted it's notable that you didn't reference it at all. The subject is the proliferation of weird intimidating Flag wavers.... 

 

As for me, I didn't vote Labour at last election, nor will I in next election (if I lived in a Labour/Tory/Reform marginal, that might be different)

  • Like 2

I do worry English people are focusing on “the flag” and their own wistful nostalgia (how very English) rather than what’s happening with the flag in 2025

stop analysing it as the mere national flag and have a look at it for what it is - the useful tool of intimidation by some extremely dodgy people (see also the Irish tricolour when the IRA were active)

defeat the problem, then you can reclaim the flag 

pretending there is no problem whilst saying “it’s just a flag” is just…. Sigh 

  • Agree 2

Unionists sometimes also paint the curbs (rwb) in Northern Ireland, much less than in the troubles.

https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/rising-sectarian-tensions-in-limavady-as-painted-kerbs-and-flags-mark-out-territory/37190789.html

Edited by malumbu
2 hours ago, malumbu said:

Unionists sometimes also paint the curbs (rwb) in Northern Ireland, much less than in the troubles.

https://m.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/northern-ireland/rising-sectarian-tensions-in-limavady-as-painted-kerbs-and-flags-mark-out-territory/37190789.html

Almost like there is a connection between excessive flag shaggery and violence 

  • Agree 3
1 hour ago, Sephiroth said:

How beautifully ironic, the article says mobs putting flags up are roaming the streets shouting "Sieg Heil" the cry of our enemy in ww2 determined to take our sovereignty away. 

Its almost moronic.

I saw something the other day that discussed how the medoa highlights the opposing ends of the situation, with the extreme right at one end and the far left at the other. What it mention are the ordinary people in the middle who don't support either extremes but still have genuine views that are being ignored by the media. 

  • Agree 1

Where are the far left in all of this flag business? Thats a red herring 

there is the far right leading this nonsense, a lot of people following them who claim to be ordinary people (but very little digging and oh guess what) and them there is everyone else (right, centre, left) opposing them 

 

there is no “both-sides” on this 

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Was planning to come on here to ask if anyone might know which celeb/royal came through Lordship Lane yesterday - was on my way up to Spurs, on bus at the roundabout by the EDT when some whistling police cyclists pulled the traffic to the side of the road to allow a biggish range rover to shoot past, on the way up towards Dog Kennel Hill. Could only make out two, maybe middle-aged, men in the front before it passed. Mildly hysterical lady on pavement was laughing/screeching with her friend that they were desperately trying to find out who it was. Had more reason to post after this lunchtime's experience. Had just got to bus stop opposite the M&S by the station when some mini cooper thing bombed through the traffic, swerving across to cut up another car to get up the hill, before two or three police cars followed about 20 seconds behind. Said mini cooper thing then reappeared coming the other way, beeping its horn to get other cars out the way before it bombed up what I think was Elsie Road, with police cars now on both sides of the road by Maxin trying to stop traffic getting in the way/half the speeding car. Bit more than I had bargained for when I set out/want in local area! Stay careful out there folks, this place is getting scarier...
    • The stop outside the chippy was still closed earlier today, although the barriers I saw yesterday have been removed, so no need for the closure.  The stop outside the church across the road is now uncovered and open
    • You all have different and conflicting interests though. It isn't necessarily appropriate for him to communicate with all of you at the same time about the same issues.    You're giving more away with each post as to how these difficulties probably arose. 
    • @CPR Dave He needs to communicate collectively with all of the beneficiaries.  That is the whole point of my original post.  Electronic communications are the best way of doing this, as I am doing now on this forum.  Apart from the gold digger who will get a six figure sum the rest of us are on four figures, and that is going down by the day. I'm offended by any suggestion that we are not behaving well.  What on earth do you mean?  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...