Jump to content

Recommended Posts

These amazing lights were bought for over £1000 back in 2012. They have 5 LED candle bulbs in the middle and look amazing when they are lit

The builders in 2014 slightly damaged one so its not perfectly round on one side but tbh you can't really notice when its up...they were up in our old house until a year ago.

They have been in dust sheets since we moved and the glass pieces could do with a clean but you will be rewarded when lit.

Come with chains and the bottom bits. 

Only small issue is at the bottom of one of the lights the metal piece that holds the bottom metal attachment broke....you can see in one of the pictures the one is still there....would require a small piece of rectangular metal to screw the bottom piece in...straightforward to sort imo.

They are big...diameter is around 65cm

Pickup from Dulwich Village SE21

Any questions please DM me

thanks

Anthony

 

20250907_165552 small.jpg

20250907_165639 small.jpg

20250907_165635 small.jpg

20250907_165545 small.jpg

20250907_165647 small.jpg

IMG-20250606-WA0024 small.jpg

IMG-20250606-WA0023 small.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Its crazy, they raise membership prices due to the refurb but things are worse than before.
    • That example seems fair enough - but wouldn’t say it’s completely analogous to the Trump situation the STORY (your caps) is about the bbc edit precisely because of what happened that day and people’s ability to brush it under the carpet. I think the edit didn’t  need to be done in that way to make the exact same point. So it’s wrong thing to do, but it isn’t actually incorrect in its point - and people should be reexamining the events and not the edit  and I don’t think it’s political to say or do this. If your supporter example played out that way then fair enough - I just cannot agree that in this case the edit fundamentally changes what he said, meant or did  - especially without events transpired   It could definitely be made more explicit but given what actually happened… ? At least hopefully at this point we are being less aggy with each other and trying to make our points 
    • But THE STORY is about a BBC edit, and its impartiality issues, not about the storming of the capital. And it's not the first time deceitful editing has been a story - there was the whole Queen scandal too.  I love the BBC and hate seeing the corporation frankly unable to remain impartial anymore. It breaks my heart, because we do have a higher standard in this country and that's what keeps us on the right side of history - not people like Trump.  A long time ago I made a film about a Trump supporter. I came into the edit one day and the editor and edited him to say something quite bigoted, which he simply never said. Luckily I spotted it. The editor's excuse was 'well it's the kind of thing he would say'. I made him take it out, because it was dishonest and you have to leave your politics at the door if you want to be a good documentarian. 
    • Showers are still cold today.  When I asked at Reception, I was told that one of the boilers was now repaired and they were just waiting for the water to warm up!  The pool was pretty cold today as well,  Still a load of grit /dirt on the bottom, seems to be getting worse.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...