Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I had assumed that this must be a scam due to the .co.uk domain (rather than police.uk or gov.uk), but it appears the be legit: https://www.met.police.uk/police-forces/metropolitan-police/areas/campaigns/2025/stay-informed-with-met-engage/

What on earth were they thinking setting up a site that could so easily be spoofed?!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/366980-met-engage/#findComment-1720108
Share on other sites

When you dig into the site, there's an ancillary domain also involved in the system: neighbourhoodalert.co.uk;  and one pointed to by the latter as an example, stayintheknow.co.uk, which seems to have been set up by Lancashire.  All three long validated by Nominet and with same registrar. 
 

metengage_etc_whois.txt

Edited by ianr
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/366980-met-engage/#findComment-1720179
Share on other sites

At the Dulwich Hill SNT meeting last night we spoke about Met. Engage. Dulwich Hill had signed up 185 households.

Scheme  had been trialled in other parts of the country successfully and now the Met. Police are rolling it out, To the end of August, the Met Police had gathered 17,000 registrations which equites to 2% of households.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/366980-met-engage/#findComment-1720181
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He played the system.  He deprived the government of money that could be spent on the country.  Whether wisely or wasted.  It (Farage) makes me sick.  How could anyone who believes in society and contributing according to their means not agree?  
    • If you are referring to his comments about  Angela Rayner's dishonest declarations resulting in evasion of tax on her purchase of the flat in hove, then there is no hypocrisy on Farage's part.  He funded the purchase of a property in his partner's name. This is 100% legitimate and makes good sense in terms of reducing IHT liability in the future - given their respective ages and individual wealth. Rayner's action was "evasion" which is illegal. Farage's action was "avoidance" which is 100% legitimate.  
    • Does anyone know or can recommend anyone to replace the cylinder on an office chair please.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...