Jump to content

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, malumbu said:

And gov is proposing cards for those with no smart phones.  

Why? Why not just accept driving licence cards or passports as we do already?

Anyway this is good to know. I will get my "Digital ID" in paper form and the government can stay out of my business on my phone.

Edited by CPR Dave
1 hour ago, Insuflo said:

It plays into the notion that immigration is the greatest threat facing this country and the root of all problems- it is not.

This is my main objection. I don't like the rhetoric. In terms of a 'digital ID', we already have one effectively, they're just formalising it / giving it a name. 

@Insuflo

Couldn't agree more - the whole focus on immigration.  Wrote to Ellie yesterday on this saying in my peer group there are more important issues.

Don't necessarily agree on other things you have posted but this is the forum at its best having real debate 

  • Agree 1
1 hour ago, CPR Dave said:

The other extremely inept political approach in the delivery of this policy, out of the blue, was calling it a BritCard and somehow expecting Irish citizens working in Northern Ireland to get on board with the idea. 

Yep.  Yet completely in keeping with this mad post-Brexit country 

58 minutes ago, Insuflo said:

Not if you remember the introduction of the Poll Tax. It galvanised a massive opposition, which eventually persuaded the Tories to bin Thatcher. It could be an anti-Starmer /Reeves focus within the labour movement.

Yeah but the poll tax was manifestly unfair financially where the richest millionaire paid same as a single pensioner in a one bed flat 

this id thing is just… hysterical 

I think digital id is potentially a good thing, number of reasons for that.

Eventually it will encompass services you already have from the goverment, your driving licence,  you NI number, your gov gateway (all obvious extensions) 

Services like photo card driving licences have already proved to have flaws, including Mr Smith, who looks similar to Mr Green,  passing Mr Greens test to get Mr Green a "dodgy" dtiving licence as an example. 

Digital id may also ensure only people entitled to NHS care get it and health tourists pay to use our health service. 

However, whilst I think.its a good idea, social media will ensure it is still born. Over the weekend I've seen so many anti digital id posts, including Kier as Davros leading the Labour Daleks (did make me chuckle) , comparisons to 1984 and even a song about it. Someone posted "what would happen if we all refused to sign up" and how within 31 days it would topple the government. 

Will it actually happen maybe , but I have a feeling, like most things whatever way it goes both sides will again employ project fear and misinformation. 

Edited by Spartacus
2 hours ago, malumbu said:

A citizen poll put it at 37 for and 32 against.

 

That's why I said 'in some form' - that figure increases to 57% when asked if they were in favour of a 'National ID Card', rather than a digital one on their phone.

That suggests a couple of things to me: firstly that the majority of people aren't mad enough to rebel over a perceived Orwellian assault on their civil liberties and, secondly, that 20% of people are worried about someone sussing that they've been looking at 'BigTits.Com' or some-such on their mobile.

I don't think it is simple as that.  Firstly many people born in the UK and legally allowed to live in the UK work for cash be it all of their working time or mates rates.

Digital ID will make it easier to prove that someone is not legally allowed to work in the UK.  It will also help where a company has an agreement with an individual who may be legal but permitted to sell on hours to others.  And for those using fake driving licenses hiring mopeds to do deliveries. Obviously you have to catch them at it. 

How much  of a deterrent this is to dodgy and reputable employers, and those with no right to work in the UK is unclear.  But that question will be asked.

On a separate matter poll tax was an awful idea and many in the then Tory party were not in board.  This is not in the same league.

And to go political how are you going to get your takeaways if there is nobody to make them and deliver them? Will be good for the more ethical companies.  

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I’m looking for a mountain bike for my 13 year old son if you have one please get in touch kind regards
    • I’m not close enough to the charity to comment but they have said this; “If you live within a 30-mile radius of our Canning Town, Lewisham, or Brede centre and can provide a forever home for one or more of the cats and kittens in our care, please visit www.celiahammond.org/adopt-a-cat for details of the animals currently seeking homes”. It suggests they are wanting to find good homes.
    • I agree that it's important to neuter cats but as I've said on a previous thread a while ago, I only know one person who was allowed to adopt a cat through Celia Hammond. I know at least 15 who have been turned down for reasons including They live on a road, not a busy road. Just a road.  They won't commit to not letting the cat go outside for fresh air even in a secure garden.  They have a job and don't commit to being at home all day every day.  These aren't reasons given in special circumstances for a traumatised cat, they are just reasons that have ruled out both me and everyone I know from being seen as adequate adopters.  I think it's incredibly upsetting that Celia Hammond  have 'so many cats needing homes and are at breaking point, in crisis' while still deciding on behalf of the cats that 9/10 times they would rather live in a cage than with someone who couldn't afford not to work or a can't afford a house that isn't on a road. The criteria essentially rule out anyone who isn't landed gentry.  I know someone will reply saying 'well I was allowed to adopt' or 'my friend has a friend who was allowed to adopt' but I'm simply relaying my own experience and that of many many people I know. It really needs to be examined.       
    • That’s around £60 per cat. It costs much more privately and is entirely reasonable. Since you’re keen on numbers perhaps think about one cat having three litters of five kittens every year, and those 15 kittens each having three litters of five every year from the first year.  It’s exponential and absolutely an emergency. You can pick your own charity to support, I’m not diminishing other appeals or causes. I imagine the need is related to people having less money and not being able to afford the fees privately. Perhaps in more prosperous times, more people could afford to neuter their cats. Let’s not wait for the good times to roll back round, let’s do it now, before it becomes an absolute crisis, and help as much as we are able to.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...