Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the reminder of those similarly serious collisions @DulvilleRes
 

It’s time for road safety to become a real priority for local police. There’s plenty of discussion about “community safety”, but reckless and dangerous driving seems to go largely unchecked.

Where are the traffic officers stopping speeding, impaired, or drug-affected drivers? Why isn’t there consistent enforcement against obscured or fake number plates, or drivers using mobile phones?

It’s also concerning that at least one recent crash reportedly involved a police pursuit and drug search. It’s not hard to see the link between high-risk driving and wider criminal behaviour. Strong, visible traffic enforcement isn’t just about road safety - it’s about community safety in the broadest sense.

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 3

A number of recent crashes appear to have happened late at night or in the early morning. It is more likely than at other times that these may be stolen cars or ones being used for crime. These are not, really, road safety issues, at least in the sense that it's all about good driving. And need different remedies. 

  • Agree 1
On 26/10/2025 at 09:36, march46 said:

Thanks for the reminder of those similarly serious collisions @DulvilleRes
 

It’s time for road safety to become a real priority for local police. There’s plenty of discussion about “community safety”, but reckless and dangerous driving seems to go largely unchecked.

Where are the traffic officers stopping speeding, impaired, or drug-affected drivers? Why isn’t there consistent enforcement against obscured or fake number plates, or drivers using mobile phones?

 

This is what Roads Policing does and they are pretty pro-active. Units are out all the time, responding to ANPR hits, which alert them to stolen vehicles and cars with cloned plates. As soon as a camera on the vast network is activated, they hunt for the target. These daily patrols are co-ordinated and take priority over driving around trying to spot general bad driving because a lot of their targets are OCGs, county lines runners, car thieves etc and mostly operating on motorways.

If police just drove around hoping to chance upon someone on a mobile phone, their hit rate would be pretty low and we'd all be complaining about wasting resources. Obviously if they do chance upon erratic driving, they'll pursue, but they can't be everywhere all of the time. 

On 26/10/2025 at 09:36, march46 said:

It’s also concerning that at least one recent crash reportedly involved a police pursuit and drug search. It’s not hard to see the link between high-risk driving and wider criminal behaviour. Strong, visible traffic enforcement isn’t just about road safety - it’s about community safety in the broadest sense.

It's not nice but, if a drunk or drug driver, or any other type of criminal, is failing to stop then it will trigger a high speed pursuit. People with something to hide won't slow down when they see a cop car, they'll hit the gas, and that's what compromises community safety. The police don't want a pursuit and will frequently stand down and let the target vehicle out of their sight if they feel public safety is being compromised. 

it isn't an area of my expertise, but logic would dictate that you are most likely doing a lot more than 20 mph to end up on your roof.

The thing that strikes me about both pictures I posted is that it is lucky there were no pedestrians around when either crashed - in the case of the car on its roof, someone could have been walking up the grass verge, and for the white car someone could have been on that traffic island. It does put debate around speed limits in context. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 1
2 hours ago, malumbu said:

Enforcing speed limits works for most drivers, and if there are serial evaders they will be caught, eventually.

Looking back to the earlier photos, someone driving at 30 mph into a solid object will do 50% more damage to the vehicle  as someone driving at 20mph.

Yes, but being caught eventually is not the same argument as 20mph will deter them in the first place, it won't. Those addicted to risk, with zero social conscience, do not tend to adhere to any sort of rules (we only have to look at ol' orange rump across the pond). On that basis, you then have to look at what else is gained and by who- yes, mitigation of damage caused by genuine accidents by normally careful drivers but also more revenue in fines garnered by the council. Most if not all the big car crashes or incidents cited on here point to criminal behaviour that will not be changed by 20mph.

  • Agree 1
  • 3 weeks later...
On 26/10/2025 at 11:04, Penguin68 said:

A number of recent crashes appear to have happened late at night or in the early morning... These are not, really, road safety issues

🤣🤣🤣

"Crashes aren't road safety issues because they happen at night when I'm tucked up in bed".

West Norwood this morning. Dangerous driver mounts the pavement, gets impaled on a bell bollard that protects the crossing, leaves vehicle unattended.

Awaiting suggestion that this was caused by a medical emergency or swerving to avoid a nun carrying early morning milk to the orphanage home or something...

20251115_104936.thumb.jpg.52c9d576c50bd361432ebc41f0e509c4.jpg

You know very well that I was suggesting that the drivers at that time were or may have been  conducting criminal enterprises when these incidents occurred or were joy riding. In either case these weren't about poor drivers or negligent drivers but criminal drivers where normal issues of safe and careful driving were not over-ridden by careless mistakes, but were a consequence of criminality. Or possibly of inebriation. We believe that at least one such incident was caused by a driver in a stolen car, who then ran off. These are very different in nature from issues of simple poor driving. And would require different remedies. 

1 hour ago, Penguin68 said:

In either case these weren't about poor drivers or negligent drivers but criminal drivers where normal issues of safe and careful driving were not over-ridden by careless mistakes, but were a consequence of criminality. 

I see we've gone from "don't make assumptions about why people wrapped their car around a lamppost" to "we can intuit a forensic offender profile from a photo of a crashed car". 🤣

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I've got an enormous red bean bag you can have which has been thoroughly pounded over the years but was a recommendation from Sensory Smart Child so might be of use to you.
    • I have lots of good quality stuffed toys that I'd be happy to go to a good home! Please let me know and I'll get them out of the loft. 
    • I booked a last minute appointment today for an eye shape as a bit of a treat as my family and I have a lot going on - cancer, dementia - so I fancied a little pick me up today. However, I left Dr Boo's feeling the exact opposite!  As soon as I had arrived at the beauticians a lady greeted me with a scowling face and basically started shouting at me saying that I was late. Apparently, she was the manager of the place! 😞 My first reaction was to apologise as I had found it difficult to park and therefore I assumed that trying to find a parking space had taken longer than I had thought.  But she continued to tell me off/shout at me - even after I'd apologised - so I calmly pointed out to her that I didn't think her behaviour or attitude was an appropriate way to greet a customer!   I then went upstairs with the actual beautician who did my eye brow shape. She was deeply embarrassed by her manager's outburst and exceedingly apologetic - btw she was also an excellent beautician who did a brilliant job shaping my eye brows. 5 stars for her!  When I got upstairs there was clock in the treatment room which said 12.18 - my appointment was at 12.15! Taking into account the altercation downstairs, plus walking up the stairs to the treatment room it seems that I wasn't actually late for my appointment at all! (See attached photo).  When I went back downstairs I spoke with the rude manageress and said I want to make an official compliant, and showed her the photograph of the clock saying 12.18 and asked her why she had she been so rude to me when I wasn't even late. TBH even if I had been late I still shouldn't have been shouted at in that way.  Her response was to say that the clock in the treatment was wrong and her watch was right and that I was at least 5 minutes late!? Even if that had been the case, no-one warrants that treatment.  I have never left a negative review before now, however,  when I tried to get hold of the owner of the beauticians to complain, the number I'd been given didn't work. Surprise, surprise.  So, Dr Boo I'd suggest you immediately put your manageress on a training course.  And perhaps the owner could give me a call to apologise!  No stars for the rude, and completely in the wrong manageress, but 5 stars for the lovely beautician who actually gave me an eye brow shape. 
    • While Dulwich library is closed for refurbishment, the other libraries in the area have extended opening hours . Nunhead Library on Gordon Rd ( just off Nunhead Green) is open Monday to Friday 10am-7pm and Saturday 10am-5pm. The refurbishment of Dulwich library is likely to take 6 months 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...