Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We’re working with the Horniman Museum & Gardens on a new campaign and we’d love your thoughts on some messaging ideas. It only takes 5 minutes, and 25 participants will win free family tickets to the Aquarium or an exhibition. 

 

We really appreciate your thoughts and support.

 

Fill out the survey: https://4xzzej6m9gv.typeform.com/horniman

 

Edited by anatomy_london
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

So I had to do the survey to understand what the concern was and I still don't know! I thought the campaign phrasings were largely ok, while the descriptors leaned oddly to the negative but left out more meaningful emotions like 'intrigued' maybe. 

Very interested to know what was inappropriate?

  • Agree 1

Sorry,  but I thought this survey was totally bizarre.

Does whoever put it together have any experience at all in this field?

How did they come to choose the answer options? 

Wouldn't they have been better having the focus group first, to gather thoughts on what to include in the survey?

As noted above, virtually all the possible responses are negative, apart from "happiness", which seems a strange approach to say the least.

Edited by Sue
1 hour ago, jazzer said:

Anyone done the survey, any thoughts on the wording of the descriptors they used? 

Let me start with Inappropriate. 

Yea, just completed it.. thought it was well, strange.. not to sure what they were hoping to achieve.. limited to only one answer.. umm

10 minutes ago, beansprout said:

Sadly, think it might be a scam.. more fool me for filling it out… lol at it, click on name.. joined what 5 hours ago… 

what has happened to the forum?

It doesn't appear to be a scam?

1 minute ago, ianr said:

Snap!

Screenshot_20251029-213352.Chrome.thumb.png.089922cb64120407bb1005b06b24a8b2.png

Well then a very badly worded survey and why only allow people one choice per question? Strange choices of answers too..

My estimation of Horniman has gone right down if they have paid for this survey..

  • Agree 1
1 hour ago, beansprout said:

Well then a very badly worded survey and why only allow people one choice per question? Strange choices of answers too..

My estimation of Horniman has gone right down if they have paid for this survey..

The one answer allowed  per question is possibly  understandable, to make the next stage in their research easier.

The actual list  of possible answers isn't.

I would be interested to know why this company was chosen to work on this campaign, and on what grounds,  and whether any other companies were considered.

Maybe the OP could comment on the reasons for the  wording of the survey?

TBH it doesn't fill one with confidence if they don't even check that their  links work when posting on a public forum under their company's real name.

Maybe they are a newbie or someone doing work experience? If so, shouldn't someone more senior have run their eye over the survey before it went live?

Very sorry if that sounds harsh. The actual ideas for the campaign are fine, and  different skills are involved for that, which might explain things to some extent.

Edited by Sue
  • Like 1
22 minutes ago, Sue said:

The one answer allowed  per question is possibly  understandable, to make the next stage in their research easier.

The actual list  of possible answers isn't.

I would be interested to know why this company was chosen to work on this campaign, and on what grounds,  and whether any other companies were considered.

Maybe the OP could comment on the reasons for the  wording of the survey?

TBH it doesn't fill one with confidence if they don't even check that their  links work when posting on a public forum under their company's real name.

Maybe they are a newbie or someone doing work experience? If so, shouldn't someone more senior have run their eye over the survey before it went live?

Very sorry if that sounds harsh. The actual ideas for the campaign are fine, and  different skills are involved for that, which might explain things to some extent.

Actually, you have just made me think about something which duurrr should have thought of earlier.. To be lenient here, I think English is not the person first language which is the only logical explanation for strange responses.. maybe even googled 

46 minutes ago, beansprout said:

Actually, you have just made me think about something which duurrr should have thought of earlier.. To be lenient here, I think English is not the person first language which is the only logical explanation for strange responses.. maybe even googled 

I think that's highly unlikely.

40 minutes ago, beansprout said:

Ok.. so what is your take then? Did you fill out strange survey?

Yes I did, in case that wasn't clear from my posts above.

What reasons do you have for thinking that English was  not the first language of the person who put the survey together?

(And even if it wasn't, how  would that  be relevant unless it made the questions hard to understand?)

I don't think the issues with the survey stem from a language problem. 

I think, though I may be wrong, that they stem from an unfamiliarity with survey methodology, and not properly thinking the process through.

14 minutes ago, ianr said:

In fairness, I think the complaints about being limited to one answer are unjustified. Clearly above the column of choices I see the text "Choose as many as you like", and the page does permit that.

Yes you are right, I missed that because in each case I could only find one possible answer I could give, but that of course doesn't mean I couldn't have given more.

Edited by Sue
1 hour ago, beansprout said:

I tried to do 2/3 and would not  let me - so no choice but to choose one.

Personally I thought the words for choice were strange but that is my own opinion.

 

Yes, the choice of  words was  strange, but so far as I could see  they were correct English? 

  • 4 weeks later...

I've just had an email from Anatomy about this, with another follow up survey asking for opinions on three different possible campaigns.

The email says "We’d love you to take a short follow-up survey to share your thoughts on the visual concepts for our new campaign." 

Anybody else?

They clearly haven't listened to any of the feedback on here, because they are still asking how proposed publicity posters (I presume) make you feel by giving a variety of options  using mainly negative words like "fear" and "disgust".

There is no "other" option so that you could suggest things like "excitement" (not that any of them did make me feel excited).

Even the children in the pictures don't look very happy. One of them is clutching a tree trunk that has fairy lights wound round it (they aren't even on) .

One of the posters  has the line "it's in our nature" for a campaign aimed at introducing children to nature, which basically makes no sense in that context (in my opinion)  because it's a different use of "nature" .  Maybe someone thought it was a clever pun, but it isn't (in my opinion).

Some of the other wording was quite meaningless, though I can't now remember what. Something about "together".

You have to say which of the three possible approaches you like best. There is no option for "none", so in my case it was which one I disliked least.

They ask if you have children of various ages, completely ignoring grandparents or carers of children.

I don't know how this company came to be chosen, but I can only assume because it is relatively local.

I think the Horniman would have done better to have had a competition for local schoolchildren to come up with ideas and posters for this project/campaign/initiative/whatever it is.

It would have been win win all round and would have been really good publicity for the Horniman. I should think the local schools and local press would have loved it.

Edited by Sue
Adding info
  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...