Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There was investment in planting Plane trees in the last 25 years and in new paving in the sections shown in the photos but unfortunately the trees are growing so fast that they're damaging the pavements and the way the paving was laid makes water collect rather than drain away.  It's such a disappointing shame and sadly it's getting worse as the trees grow bigger and bigger 😔.  

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Agree 1
7 hours ago, malumbu said:

There's no spare money.  If you can do better stand as a local Councillor in the next election.  There are far worse things going on in the world.

I doubt if complaining to Elon Musk will do a lot.

I'm not sure that's true- as in 'no spare money'; I am not commenting on the rest of your statement. I believe Southwark has a sizeable fund of money accrued from parking fines and I also believe that can be reinvested into street upkeep...if the Council chooses to use it that way.

They certainly found the dosh to reconfigure and landscape Dulwich Village junction (including use of expensive, imported Indian sandstone not found elsewhere). They also seem to have money to narrow roads and build out  and landscape pavement- as in MGN LTN. 
 

 

Edited by first mate
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 3

@malumbu This isn’t just a cosmetic issue — I personally know two elderly people who’ve fallen flat on their faces because of these pavements. I spent three hours at King’s College Hospital with one of them, and they’re far from the only cases. After 17 years without improvements, it’s completely reasonable to expect the council to address a basic safety hazard.

7 hours ago, Moovart said:

There was investment in planting Plane trees in the last 25 years and in new paving in the sections shown in the photos but unfortunately the trees are growing so fast that they're damaging the pavements and the way the paving was laid makes water collect rather than drain away.  It's such a disappointing shame and sadly it's getting worse as the trees grow bigger and bigger 😔.  

All the more reason for the council to step in and fix the pavements properly. 

  • Agree 1

I was going to tone down my original response as it came across a tad passive aggressive, but it's got the debate going.  I expect there are 1000s of km across the country which could have the pavements improved.  Not sure, even in Southwark, wh3ere you'd start.

 

55 minutes ago, rMattos said:

@malumbu This isn’t just a cosmetic issue — I personally know two elderly people who’ve fallen flat on their faces because of these pavements. I spent three hours at King’s College Hospital with one of them, and they’re far from the only cases. After 17 years without improvements, it’s completely reasonable to expect the council to address a basic safety hazard.

All the more reason for the council to step in and fix the pavements properly. 

Unfortunately elderly people are likely to trip and fall even where pavements are well maintained.

I have fallen flat on my face twice, once in Bellenden Road  (requiring an ambulance)  and once in Adys Road, where I was just badly shaken up but not injured.

A (less elderly) friend of mine also recently fell locally.  Also requiring a visit to A&E.

All in the morning in broad daylight.

I think it's unreasonable to expect every pavement in the area to be kept constantly in pristine condition. In both instances where I fell, and also where my friend fell, there were not obvious tripping hazards.

In fact if there are obvious tripping hazards, you could say that people - including elderly people - would be more likely to notice and avoid them.

Edited by Sue
Adding info

Talking only about Lordship Lane, I know of young people who have come a cropper because of uneven paving, cracks etc., and who suffered injuries requiring hospital treatment. I feel if money can be found for some of the recent projects we have seen locally involving pedestrian areas, then some basic upkeep of the high street pavement is surely possible.

I do think Moovart makes a good point about tree planting and mature Plane trees. We want trees, imagine how the area would look without them, but they can cause damage to pavements.

Edited by first mate
On 23/11/2025 at 11:41, malumbu said:

There's no spare money. 

Huh, did you see how much the council spent on Dulwich Square? There is money to do this type of thing, they are making millions from PCNs, CPZs etc.

I think we can all agree Lordship Lane needs some TLC - the pavements are awful. Why is it that the councillors are happy to throw millions at Dulwich Square but next to nothing to Lordship Lane that gets 1000x more visitors every day?

Perhaps a Goose Green resident can email one of the councillors to ask them.

Edited by Rockets
  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No, it's Muffin the Mule and Annette Mills. The Muffin Man lives in Drury Lane. Do you know him? 🤣
    • sorry but that is not the muffin man
    • I'm presuming you're not a regular visitor to the park, if you need to read a report rather than just know what wildlife is in the park. All those trees to the East of the site, which is the direction most of the stages blast towards, have many nesting / resident birds in May. I've seen Woodpeckers and hear owls regularly. Did you also read the 'bat' survey for the 2025 event, which confirmed many species of foraging bats in the area which WOULD be affected by loud noise & bright lights? And I'm guessing it's no coincidence that I haven't seen a Stag beetle for several years now, which I used to see regularly around May / June in the SW corner of the park. Plenty of biodiversity, all of which is clearly disturbed massively by this event, in what is a PUBLIC park. I'd be very interested to know where it says that the park was "designed" for massive festivals? And it's not "1-2 weekends" , it's just shy of four weeks that the site is unavailable to the public, plus many months of reinstatement that effectively turn it into a (re) construction site throughout the summer, just when the younger generations i.e. children would like to enjoy it...
    • The idea that the park was "designed" for events like a 5-day music festival is misplaced, to say the least. Excerpt taken from Southwark Council website about the park:   "Peckham Rye Park and Common is a Victorian park and historic common featuring ornamental gardens, flowing streams, woodland, and a lake. It provides a pleasant refuge for both the local community and wildlife. The garden is an area of tranquillity with sensory summer planting, a winter garden, bug towers, a beehive, a pond, raised beds for community fruit and vegetable growing and a shaded meadow area with a loggery and seating. The entry gates were specially commissioned and designed by Heather Burrell. This is a beautiful oasis of peace amid the bustle of city life. "  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...