Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Have a look ,the interior looks original , wall tiles ,tiles floor ,mirrors .But I could be wrong .

If I'm not ,I can only think that a lot of it must have been paneled over .


It's a hairdressers called Blue Tit . No idea what it's like but they have a gorgeous range of natural hair products and the male hairdresser had beautiful hair !


Honestly worth checking it out for the interior .

intexasatthe moment Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you think the interior is orginal John K ?

>

> If you've seen it of course .


Yes, it's original, and they've taken care of it in their refurbishment.


John K

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not Dalston.

>

> I am reliably told (by estate agents) that these

> and others are colonisers from the SW postal

> districts, both north and south of the river.

>

> John K


Nope. Blue Tit London - Dalston, Clapton, Peckham.

ed history ,thanks for that .I was sure it must be . it has to have been covered up surely to have survived .


And ,sorry to bore on ....but do you know what kind of shop it would have been originally ? A butchers ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for offering. Just this morning I took some pounds to Albrighton then got back to find more on the ground so have gathered those too. Let me get back to you privately about possibly coming here in the next few days? Thanks. 
    • TBF, the council has tackled graffiti on Walworth, Old and New Kent Roads - you can see that many businesses there have been cleaned up en masse - but Rye Lane hasn’t. 
    • Hi, I am from the Southwark Day Centre and could collect some apples if I am. It too late... Bettina 
    • Labour's latest Rye Lane Ward newsletter is now saying that demolition in the square will start this summer and that the wider station upgrade is expected to be signed off this year - as explained above, sadly wrong on both counts. It describes the renovation of adjacent buildings on Blenheim Grove as "successful", despite having lain empty for a couple of years, longer than the actual renovation works, before saying "the Council is hopeful [it] will see its first new occupants move in to this year". Cue desperate attempt to get at least one in before end of financial year? As for the other topic, in "November 2023, faced with a huge increase in graffiti across the borough, Labour-run Southwark council took action". Nice turn of phrase eh? Rather, after community pressure regarding years of inaction by said Labour-run council, it's finally started to do a little bit, a little late. Surely there would be more chance of resolving issues if our council could for once be part of an honest, informed discussion?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...