Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Okay, I love chimney breasts and have actually reinstated a working fireplace in my front room. I love having it as a focal point and the character it lends to a room.


However, we are doing some work to the house and for not too much extra cost we could remove the chimney breast from our 2nd reception room currently used as a dining room. The chimney there can't be reinstated as the stack above in the 2nd bedroom was removed ages ago. It will never be a working fireplace and if we did remove it, it would allow us to have a much more functional room-- right now it can be a little tight to get up from the table and out around others and in general feels a bit cramped.


I am concerned though that the room might look a bit balnd without a focal point and worry that if we sell on, it might put people off.


Thoughts?

Chimney breasts are useful to put shelves at one side of? Or both sides, possibly? Shelves could be useful in a dining room?


If you aren't wanting to do that, and you'd have more space without it, why not take it out - you could have a picture, or a mirror, as a focal point in the room?


Or if you're concerned about the effect on a future sale, why not ask the advice of an estate agent before you decide?


ETA: Is it the chimney breast itself, or removing the fireplace? I realise I may have misunderstood your post ....

It's the breast itself but as there is nothing above it structurally, its a much easier job than normal. We are going to have bookselves just not on the wall that has the chimey. If you can imagine, the wall with the chimney is the narrower dimension of what is a retangular room so shelves would be better elsewhere rather than the current alcoves.


Like you say, I am concerned both about future value and focal point but from a useability perspective I think it makes sense.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ah that was it.... When you realise politicians are only ever in it for themselves then everything starts to make sense.  
    • Yup. Student politics. https://bright-green.org/2012/04/09/democracy-and-direct-action-an-interview-with-edinburgh-universitys-new-student-president-james-mcash/
    • I wonder whether his political epiphany and renaissance will stretch to him using his real name - James Ashworth-McLintock - rather than the more proletarian 'McAsh'. To my mind, the only people who should have self-bestowed mononyms are very talented Brazilian footballers - Pele, Kaka, Ronaldinho - very talented female pop icons - Madonna, Shakira, Sonia - or Russian revolutionaries - Lenin, Stalin, Trotsky. Sonia's greatest hits compilation, 'Greatest Hits', is out now on vinyl & CD through PWL Recordings.
    • Probably more helpful to ask simply whether McCash was affiliated with the Greens before becoming a Labour councillor. Trying to explain your thought process and unravel your fevered imagination (particularly when it comes to local politica) is the kind of thing that might require several years of psychoanalysis.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...