Jump to content

Ryedale SE22 - Proposal to block end of Ryedale at junction of Underhill Road - January 2026


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, jimbo1964 said:

It's incredible how may people would rather clog up the streets driving to Lordship Lane or Dulwich Park rather than hop or a P13 (or even walk if able). 

 

My experience of driving the 16 minute walk from Ryedale to Lordship Lane is 5 minutes of driving and 10 minutes trying to find a parking space.

Walking isn’t for everyone, some people will still need to drive. But if more people who can walk do walk then there should be less overall traffic for those of us who need to drive to contend with.

As a pedestrian, motorist and cyclist, I’d welcome more LTNs on local roads (not A/B roads) to help make our network more suitable for cycling.

  • Like 3

Took a walk down Ryedale today and I can't see any of the traffic problems complained of. 

 

Is there any chance these were just temporary issues caused by the problematic temporary traffic lights that were in place at the St Aidan's road junction last summer / autumn?

Anyway, there's a feedback form here where you can let the council know how terrible this idea is, if it ever gets implemented!

https://engage.southwark.gov.uk/en-GB/projects/ryedale-traffic-scheme

 

 

  • Agree 1
46 minutes ago, CPR Dave said:

Is there any chance these were just temporary issues caused by the problematic temporary traffic lights that were in place at the St Aidan's road junction last summer / autumn?

Anyway, there's a feedback form here where you can let the council know how terrible this idea is, if it ever gets implemented!

According to the papers released in response to the FOI application the allegations of excessive traffic speed and volume were made in March 2025, with the ensuing automated trafic counts being made in the last week of April; so no obvious chance.

I suggest you reserve at least some of your feedback to the council until some time into the first six months of implementation, when you'll be more likely  to have the benefit of some knowledge of its effects.

Edited by ianr
  • Agree 1

I think it will be more likely to be the disadvantages of knowledge of its effects, Ian, but I did say the form was there to let the council know  "how terrible this idea is, if it ever gets implemented!".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Is GH Metals Ltd. still trading? I have tried all 3 phone numbers, but nobody is picking up.  If closed, any recommendations for other scrap metal merchants near by?
    • It's great that the relatively new type garden bags seem to be a lot bigger than the old ones, but has anybody else found that they disintegrate in the rain? I have two full ones in front of my house (too small to call the space a garden) and  they both  seem to have developed large holes when they got wet in the recent heavy rain. They mostly have prickly rose prunings in, which doesn't help.
    • But they are open when it's dark at some times of the year. If they weren't, they would have no need for an illuminated sign in the first place.
    • How on earth do you equate people asking on a local forum  about police presence and road closure near their home with "busybodies and ghoulish people gossiping" , when they are asking because they don't know what has happened? And why have you included  that link? Nobody has posted any photos on here.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...