Jump to content

Ryedale SE22 - Proposal to block end of Ryedale at junction of Underhill Road - January 2026


Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, jimbo1964 said:

It's incredible how may people would rather clog up the streets driving to Lordship Lane or Dulwich Park rather than hop or a P13 (or even walk if able). 

 

My experience of driving the 16 minute walk from Ryedale to Lordship Lane is 5 minutes of driving and 10 minutes trying to find a parking space.

Walking isn’t for everyone, some people will still need to drive. But if more people who can walk do walk then there should be less overall traffic for those of us who need to drive to contend with.

As a pedestrian, motorist and cyclist, I’d welcome more LTNs on local roads (not A/B roads) to help make our network more suitable for cycling.

  • Like 3

Took a walk down Ryedale today and I can't see any of the traffic problems complained of. 

 

Is there any chance these were just temporary issues caused by the problematic temporary traffic lights that were in place at the St Aidan's road junction last summer / autumn?

Anyway, there's a feedback form here where you can let the council know how terrible this idea is, if it ever gets implemented!

https://engage.southwark.gov.uk/en-GB/projects/ryedale-traffic-scheme

 

 

  • Agree 1
46 minutes ago, CPR Dave said:

Is there any chance these were just temporary issues caused by the problematic temporary traffic lights that were in place at the St Aidan's road junction last summer / autumn?

Anyway, there's a feedback form here where you can let the council know how terrible this idea is, if it ever gets implemented!

According to the papers released in response to the FOI application the allegations of excessive traffic speed and volume were made in March 2025, with the ensuing automated trafic counts being made in the last week of April; so no obvious chance.

I suggest you reserve at least some of your feedback to the council until some time into the first six months of implementation, when you'll be more likely  to have the benefit of some knowledge of its effects.

Edited by ianr
  • Agree 1

I think it will be more likely to be the disadvantages of knowledge of its effects, Ian, but I did say the form was there to let the council know  "how terrible this idea is, if it ever gets implemented!".

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Many decades  ago (not in London)  I tried to take my cat for a walk like that. He didn't like it at all! I never tried again!
    • You've revived a 16 year old thread to plug your business?! I'm genuinely impressed!
    • Jon and his Team came over today to clear two gutters at front of the house.  Job completed professionally and quickly, very friendly and reasonable prices.  Will be using again in the future. Highly recommend.    Jon - 07908 953257 https://www.jonsmithscleaningservices.co.uk
    • In deed.   An hour is optimistic. I'd always use the train/tube, so many options from the slowish Picadilly, quick Heathrow Express and Lizzy line in the middle. In the old days I'd go out to Feltham via Clapham Junction and either get a cab from there or the bus to avoid central London Alternatively 3 hours by bus only Or a couple of hours by bike, I have cycled there a few times including illegally going through the tunnel as it is so bike unfriendly.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...