Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Underhill is closed off in the  section just south of Barry Road - the road works (well, there's no work going on, obviously, but the blocking fencing) looks to be in exactly, or almost exactly the same spot as in the autumn - so no P13s (yet again) and the diversion via Friern.

I'm looking for our Mr Cheerful to find the bright side in this again.

For me, the words incompetent, lazy, and clowns spring to mind.

  • Like 1

There was no sign either of workmen or indeed of any work having started, other than fencing off a section of the road. I do know it can take time to get teams together, but the statement from Thames suggesting everything was actively being addressed was simply not true. Nothing had yet been done other than blocking the road, and far more of the road than seemed impacted by any leak. Had Thames said the area had been secured and work would start as soon as a team could be assembled that would have been true. But, like so many in officialdom nowadays, a lie seemed a better choice. 

You wouldn't like it. It points out the costs to the public of extended road works and lack of joined up planning to reduce time when roads are not available for use, a consideration you have railed against - such as the time the A205 junction with London Road was being worked on. 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • We had a take-away from Aroma Lab last night. I was impressed, utterly delicious stir fried tofu and sweet and sour chicken. Generous portions too… will definitely make a habit of eating their home-cooked food. 
    • I think that's a big assumption.  Many people vote for the candidate precisely because they are a member of a particular party and represent that party's policiies.  I personally didn't know who McAsh was in the last election, but I knew what party he represented.  When politicians don't act "morally" what are we to think of them and their motivations? But I think there will be people who want to vote Labour, don't know that McAsh has defected and accidentally vote Green precisely because they do vote for the name.  Yes, you could say they need to read the ballot paper more carefully but it's possible to see one thing and not notice another.
    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...