Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Even if your regular parking bay is on the border of Westminster all the parking bays just outside Westminster will most likely be full before well before 8am.


It's not a service anyway. It doesn't actually cost the council anything once they've painted the lines on the road. By that logic you could say that zebra crossings or wastebins are a service. Even if you define them as 'services' why charge for one thing and not another.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> and so the problem is what? Society isn't an

> homogenous blob is it - just because some people

> don't like being charged for X, doesn't make it a

> bad administrative decision surely?


I was just agreeing with citizen about our taxes being our contribution to society. But on that point it also makes the government (all forms and levels) accountable for where our money goes. If suddenly a new revenue stream is needeed that wasn't needed in the past I want a fucking good explanation why. And it also means that the people have an obligation to hold them to account.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> Absolutely - free wardens to check if people have

> parked illegally. free monitoring of traffic

> levels to see if more bays are needed. F*** it -

> just paint white lines - it's the future!!!


Come on! Yeah because I really do see council officials watching parking bays regularly 'monitoring traffic'. As for traffic wardens they don't give a sh*t about motorcycle bays, or at least they didn't used to. Why? Because they're free, or at least they were. So lets introduce charging for say, using pelican crossings, because they need to be maintained and of course there needs to be a council official to monitor them, and a warden to make sure people have paid. What about zebra crossings or wastebins. F** it lets just start charging for everything - it's the future!!!

I think the problem started with the congestion charge.. made it free for bikes so everyone started to scooter in. then they realised that only a limited number of spaces so they change car spaces to bikes and they lose out on a revenue stream. I'm guessing but would not take long till City of London takes this up and then all boroughs.

touch? D&C


up to a point anyway. Introducing a charge shouldn't mean immediate protest. If everyone in the world traveled everywhere on foot (currently free) I could easily see a pricing mechanism introduced to encourage people to transfer to other modes of transport (or not traveling at all)


But are you seriously suggesting that all cars/bikes/bicycles should have free for all parking? Because beyond that, things start to get more complicated than you are painting (ouch) them

On another note if you get an electric scooter you can park for free.. I'm sure this would then change once they found out the scooters were running down 5 people a week because they could not hear them screaming through the traffic at 20 miles an hour..

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> touch? D&C

>

> up to a point anyway. Introducing a charge

> shouldn't mean immediate protest. If everyone in

> the world traveled everywhere on foot (currently

> free) I could easily see a pricing mechanism

> introduced to encourage people to transfer to

> other modes of transport (or not traveling at

> all)

>

> But are you seriously suggesting that all

> cars/bikes/bicycles should have free for all

> parking? Because beyond that, things start to get

> more complicated than you are painting (ouch) them



It's an interesting point. Which of the council services should or shouldn't we pay for? Clearly something like a planning application would merit a charge because a service is provided to an individual (or company) who is the sole beneficiary and that service is provided at the individuals request. By the same logic I think it's fair for a council to charge for parking, for cars or motorcyles, but any revenue received should be ring-fenced and should not exceed the cost to the council of providing the service. i.e. it shouldn't be just another revenue stream for the council.

I would argue that any service where demand exceeds capacity needs some form of control - possibly pricing, or possibly encouragement based.


however I think that 10-15 years of mainstream internet use and stable economy has led people to think that switches and levers can be pulled and "hey presto" more services are onstream. I really really think traffic (people/public transport/private transport) and accommodation of same is a major problem which has yet to be addressed properly and will get worse

Yes, all 12 electric scooters in Westminster can park for free.


A parking attendant, working under contract for APCOA or NCP or whatever, earning ?60/day will have paid for himself and be generating profit for his bosses and the council with his second PCN of the day. It's big business.

There are too many two wheeled vehicles in London. Within 10 years we'll look like Shanghai did 30 years ago. So perhaps a charge is a good thing with concessions for fully loaded tandems and motorbikes with pillion and sidecar passengers.


This is the future.

They're still around. I've seen them in use on military sites like airfields and in big US business parks. The i-real can be used by able and disabled people. Has full phone and web communications, pretty light displays, parking sensors and a max speed of 20mph.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...