Jump to content

Recommended Posts

the hubbie and two smalls were walking home from the common yesterday

when a lit cigarette stub came flying out of the 1st floor window of our

neighbours and landed a foot away from hubbie.


quite apart from whether it was deliberate (i don't think it was --

had it been me walking by then i would think it might be, but not tosh)

isn't it a really bad idea to throw lit cigs out the window? and if

you agree that it is, then do you think he should have said something?

(i.e. knocked and the door and said something like "i'm sure you don't

realise that your cig has just jumped out the window").


i tried something similar once when i saw a teenage girl (in school uniform)

drop a drink box on the ground, smash it with her foot, and then leave it

there, about two foot from a bin. i picked up and said "oops, i think you

dropped this" in as nice a way possible. she nearly kicked the ~*@" out of me!

nobody else at the bus stop supported me or stood up for me... but then when

the girl sauntered off a few said "god, kids these days" "what are her parents

like" etc. leaving me with the distinct impression that they agreed that what

she had done was unacceptable but that what i had done was perhaps equally so.


i was also once in a car with a guy who pulled over another driver b/c

the other driver was drunk... sort of like a "citizens arrest" but without the

arrest.


how far do we acceptably take social responsibility???

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/3856-flying-lit-fags/
Share on other sites

ooof serious questions - is that a good idea today?


I applaud your willingness to stand up and be counted - the scene you describe at the bus stop illustrates the real problem in the country - everyone is waiting for someone else to do their work for them


"When I were a lad etc etc" bad parents and kids were plentiful, but the wider world of adults were not afraid to compensate. Obviously people are going to worry about more violent repercussions these days but most problems would fade significantly if more people were like you I reckon shosh

good point about serious questions this morning...


certainly SOMEONE at the luau i attended last night

should have shown some social responsibility (or at

least some sympathy) and stepped in when i was dancing

badly and drunkenly (pina coladas go down soooo easily)

in a grass skirt to the barenaked ladies with a....

(shudder shudder... in fact i'm now feeling a little sick)

high school musical microphone in my hand.


worse still, i didn't even know the words to the song but

i'm pretty sure i was pretending i did...

barenaked ladies??? ooooh dear


strangely enough, I was just today catching up with Doug Stanhope's blog where he mentions his embarrassing possession of same


Stanhope re: CDs



specifically:

"?Long Tall Glasses? by Leo Sayers is a great song and even a music snob might let you get away with it for it?s obscurity. But, if you knew that I had not one but three BareNakedLadies songs shuffling around in there like some Russian Roulette party fauz pas waiting to happen?"

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • the same complaint was made about usa news stations 4 years ago.  its an old story. Its quite shocking how intelligent people are so easily manipulated. I
    • With slightly less respect Headnun I have  watched the 1 hour video - he said what he said and he did what he did. And his faux-wink wink “no violence people” fools no one but fools. Are you a fool?    the bbc told the truth - and it’s a straight up lie to say otherwise. Did they edit and cut to the chase to make a point? Absolutely  and correctly  he was not edited to say things he didn’t say  I cannot believe you watched the entire video and are trying to say the bbc edit somehow misrepresented what he said and Back in the real world - did the nutters who showed up at the white house materialise because of a bbc edit ffs - have some self respect and recognise what’s going on 
    • Friends and family in the 'States always say how wonderful it is to be in Britain and see our news coverage.  It's all partisan out there. The BBC manages to simultaneously p off the left and the right so must be doing something right.
    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...