the french restaurant on lordship lane - bad service beware using Timeout Card

[zeban]

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> boswell Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Thought it was the other Le C place we weren't

> > supposed to mention but have just checked the

> > Business section rules and seen it is actually

> Le

> > Chardon we're not allowed to mention.

>

> xxxxxx

>

> I think that's a mistake.

>

> ETA: The one I thought we weren't allowed to

> mention was because a disgruntled ex staff member

> posted a load of "interesting" stuff about the

> business on here, which led to the ban. If memory

> serves.

Sorry but disgruntled needs to be in quotation marks ;-)

[Sue]

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > ETA: The one I thought we weren't allowed to

> > mention was because a disgruntled ex staff

> member

> > posted a load of "interesting" stuff about the

> > business on here, which led to the ban. If

> memory

> > serves.

xxxxxxxx

zeban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry but disgruntled needs to be in quotation

> marks ;-)

xxxxxxxx

The employee in question wasn't disgruntled then?

disgruntled

dɪsˈgrʌnt(ə)ld/

adjective: disgruntled

1.

angry or dissatisfied.

synonyms: dissatisfied, discontented, aggrieved, resentful, fed up, displeased, unhappy, disappointed, disaffected, malcontent;

ETA: The use of the word "disgruntled" was not intended to indicate whether or not the employee's post was true - I have no idea, how could I have? But the post did not put the establishment in question in a good light, hence their reaction.

[zeban]

fair enough Sue, but no wasn't disgruntled, just responded to a customer's post(who was disgruntled) with honesty. It may have been 'negative' but it was the truth. Sorry, long time ago but couldn't let that slide, sorry!

[Sue]

zeban Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fair enough Sue, but no wasn't disgruntled, just

> responded to a customer's post(who was

> disgruntled) with honesty. It may have been

> 'negative' but it was the truth. Sorry, long time

> ago but couldn't let that slide, sorry!

xxxxxxx

Oh well, I doubt anybody else on here could give a damn :))

If they even know who the person/you was/are, which I didn't until today and still don't in real life.

And if you weren't disgruntled at all, why should it even have been in quotation marks?

I did say "if memory serves".

The details hardly matter, do they? It was only intended as an indication of why Le C********* won't allow discussion of itself on here.

Anyway, the thread is not about that establishment!

[zeban]

It was the owner's words and her justification for not allowing discussion about her establishment when in reality that wasn't the case.

But indeed this thread isn't about that establishment- people just got confused- so I will stop talking now or the owner will be threatening to sue the poor EDF again

[Administrator]

Well spotted, it is the Le hanging lampshade that should not be mentioned. My mistake and sorry for the confusion. I've changed the name in the rules.