Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I created this map using ward level data from the Metropolitan Police. Similar to the Met's own map, but they only show two-year changes. I thought it was interesting to look at a longer-term trend. It shows that compared to the rest of London, crime rates in this area are fairly low. The Lane ward is higher, but has seen one of the fastest rates of decline over the past 5 and 10 years.


Overall crime rate for London is 91 crimes per 1000 population, and Southwark is 110.


Of the 624 London wards, these are the rankings of selected wards...


The Lane, 51st highest rate (150 crimes per 1000 population). 105th highest reduction in crime over 5 years (-28%).

Village, 331st highest rate (74 crimes per 1000 population). 167th highest reduction in crime over 5 years (-24%).

East Dulwich, 375th highest rate (70 crimes per 1000 population). 353rd highest reduction in crime over 5 years (-14%).

South Camberwell, 451st highest rate (63 crimes per 1000 population). 256th highest reduction in crime over 5 years (-19%).

Peckham Rye, 455th highest rate (62 crimes per 1000 population). 219th highest reduction in crime over 5 years (-21%).



http://datacollator.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/london-crime-statistics-by-ward.html

very interesting - but as rates are given per 1000 of the population which sounds totally fair

wouldn't that result in skewing results against areas where the population may be low but actual numbers of people physically in the streets high. eg places where many people congregate for transport, entertainment or shopping

PeckhamRose Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Wow. This backs up what the police tell us every

> time we attend the Police Ward Panel! Love living

> here!


That's because these figures are invented by Plod itself (see http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25022680), allegedly according to whatever gets targets met or makes a good case for more funding.


The British Crime Survey is regarded (by government and others, when it suits them) as being more reliable. However, the BCS is done through interviews with about 50,000 randomly-selected people, so won't be directly comparable at ward level, and won't be fine-grained enough to base strategies on. It's also probable that the victims of nastier crimes, such as murder, would be less likely than average to respond.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...