Jump to content

Recommended Posts

OK, so I created a new combined calendar and (after a bit of faffing about) imported the contents of my existing two calendars into it, expecting then to be able to delete the old ones and just use the new one for 2014. Because it was all getting a bit complicated with two, even though I could see one from the other.


BUT


It appears the two existing calendars are both by default designated "primary" calendars - one for my Goose email address and one for my Sue email address. Even though they're both under the same name.


And having googled blah blah, found that:


"Note: It is not possible to delete your primary calendar. Instead, you can clear all the events, rename it, and schedule new events to effectively replace your original primary calendar."


SO, it seems that I can't just have one calendar which I can put stuff into from both email addresses? Which is a bit useless? Also other people need to be able to view it/them and it would be a lot easier if there was only one.


Advice please?


And then I've got to find out how to access it/them from my phone, AAAARRRRGGGGHHHH :(

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/39858-google-calendars-advice-needed/
Share on other sites

If the technicalities won't let you do exactly what you want, can't you just view/use both calenders at once? I have my own one, but then also access to several clinic ones and I can view them all at once both on PC and phone (though I have to keep an eye on how I enter things on my phone as I sometimes end up with stuff on the shared diary by mistake).

Twirly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the technicalities won't let you do exactly

> what you want, can't you just view/use both

> calenders at once? I have my own one, but then

> also access to several clinic ones and I can view

> them all at once both on PC and phone (though I

> have to keep an eye on how I enter things on my

> phone as I sometimes end up with stuff on the

> shared diary by mistake).


xxxxxx


Yes, thanks, I can view/use both calendars at once and have been, but it's a nuisance. I'd rather just have one!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...