Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi All,


A friend of mine was shown round 106 Lordship Lane a few days ago (after Haus Of Wood vacated) and submitted what she (and I) believed was a very strong offer to turn the space into a temporary retail unit (the landlord apparently only wants it to be temporary).


She was told flatly that the offer had been rejected and that there would be no discussion about it. The owner apparently IS going to be opening a coffee shop/bar there imminently.


Didn't this application get declined last year for a variety of reasons, including a misleading approach which saw old deeds used that didn't show adjacent houses that had been built ten years previously?


I'm concerned that this landlord may be trying to sneak some kind of application under the radar and that the (yet again empty) shop front with the estate agent sign in the window is just a rouse to keep us all quiet and assume a new retail unit will be opening soon...?


I for one don't want yet another restaurant/bar/cafe on LL, however this application has been dressed up. I suspect that in no time at all, later night openings will become the norm, then an alcohol license will be granted and we'll very quickly be seeing the landlord's original plan in full swing.


Any opinions on this?


JJ

> Didn't this application get declined last year for a variety of reasons


A change of use to A3 restaurant application was refused, 1 August 2013. See attached or this http://planningonline.southwark.gov.uk/AcolNetCGI.exe?ACTION=UNWRAP&RIPNAME=Root.PgeResultDetail&TheSystemkey=9549506 or post 4.


> Any opinions on this?


I don't see anything to have an opinion about. If you have any concerns, take them up with the Planning Department.

Thanks ianr. If you look at previous posts on this matter you'll see that there was an awful lot of discussion about late night openings and a roof terrace inches from residents' bedroom windows. There was also the discussion about retail versus restaurant use and what it meant to the area as a whole.


I'm just wondering what everyone else's thoughts are. I know I wouldn't want a terrace full of people looking into my kids' bedrooms. I don't particularly want another cafe/restaurant either - but then I'm probably a little biased. I just think the area could do with more retail to keep it's identity as a buzzing high street.

So why the refusal of my friend's offer and their confidence that it will be opening as a cafe/restaurant imminently? How do we see if a new proposal's been submitted or if the old refusal has been challenged as it states can happen in that document?


JJ

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What was he doing on the stage at Glastonbury? Or on the stage at the other concert in Finsbury Park? Grinning like a Cheshire cat whilst pissed and stoned 20 somethings on the promise of free internet sung-- Oh Jeremy Corbyn---  What were his policies for Northern mining towns with no jobs or infrastructure? Free Internet and university places for youngsters. What were his other manifesto pledges? Why all the ambiguity over Brexit?  I didn't like Thatcher, Blair or May or Tony but I respected them as politicians because they stood by what they believed in. I respect all politicians across the board that stick to their principles. Corbyn didn't and its why he got  annihilated at the polls. A socialist, anti imperialist and anti capitalist that said he voted for an imperialist and pro capitalist cabal. He refused to say how he'd vote over and over again until the last knockings. He did so to appease the Islington elite and middle class students he was courting. The same people that were screaming that Brexit was racist. At the same time the EU were holding black and Asian immigrants in refugee camps overseas but not a word on that! Corbyn created and courted a student union protest movement that screamed at and shouted down anyone not on the left . They claimed Starmer and the centre right of labour were tories. He didn't get elected  because he, his movement and policies were unelectable, twice. He turned out not to have the convictions of his politics and died on his own sword.    Reform won't win an election. All the idiots that voted for them to keep out Labour actually enabled Labour. They'll be back voting tory next time.    Farage wouldn't be able to make his millions if he was in power. He's a very devious shyster but I very much doubt he'd actually want the responsibility that governance requires.
    • The purge of hard left members that were part of Corbyn's, Mcdonnel's and Lansmans momentum that purged the party of right wing and centrist members. That's politics. It's what Blair did to win, its what Starmer had to do to win. This country doesn't vote in extreme left or right governments. That's partly why Corbyn lost  We're pretty much a centrist bunch.  It doesn't make it false either. It's an opinion based on the voting patterns, demography and statistics. Can you explain then why former mining constituencies that despise the tories voted for them or abstained rather than vote for Corbyns Labour?  What is the truth then? But he never got elected!!! Why? He should have been binned off there and then. Why he was allowed to hang about is an outrage. I hold him party responsible for the shit show that we've had to endure since. 
    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...