Jump to content

Advice on joining 2 flats together: mortgage


Ellie78

Recommended Posts

We are hoping to put 2 flats we own together and renovate to form c 1500sq feet family home.


The value of the property would be significantly higher than the purchase price both properties are mortgaged for


I have no clue as to how to deal with the mortgage aspect of the deal and have no idea how to start: we need to go from 2 mortgages to 1, and borrow more money to fund the renovation (c. 70,000).


Mortgage brokers I've spoken to seem to have no clue or experience in this relatively complex operation and I have no idea who to talk to.


Anyone done this and can offer advice as to mortgage issues?

I don't think you legally can join two properties with two mortgages. We have to reduce it to one mortgage (ie pay off the smaller - 60k- one) to integrate them. The issue is more how the legalities have to be dealt with in order to get a mortgage, and how the new value is reflected. It looks to me like we would have to get a bridging loan to do the renovation and physically put them together- otherwise how is a new lender - one looking for the first time at this new more valuable property going to be able to value it.



I could really do with chatting to someone with experience but brokers have been clueless about the mechanics from the mortgage point of view.


It's going to cost us c. 130k to pay off mortgage and renovate (which includes small extension of basement). But it will give us same floor space as house, which we couldn't afford by any stretch of the imagination ...

It can be done - my neighbours did it. From what I remember, they were able to remortgage once the work was done and the council had reclassified it as a single dwelling. It was a pain though and they used a specialist broker. I can ask them who it was and PM you?
Aren't the only liens that the mortgagees currently have solely on the flat leaseholds that you're planning to demolish and abolish? I don't think they'd like that. My inexpert guess is that both of those mortgages would have to be cleared, and replaced by one to one or both of you as redeveloping freeholder. The new lender would presumably need to be satisfied that any loan could be recovered, even factoring in whatever probability there was of the approved redevelopment not being properly completed. I'd be talking to a lawyer first, as a one-stop advice centre on both correct legal process and the practicalities. They'll presumably have seen plenty of cases of purchase for redevelopment; may even be able to recommend particular lenders, brokers, or valuers.

ianr, yeah I'm sure a lender wouldn't be happy about effectively abloshing their collateral! When we were looking at it, it seemed like the way to go was to pay off one of the mortgages, then on the mortgaged property you will need a deed of substituted security - i.e. substituting the flat for the whole house on the mortgage agreement. This is a fairly common procedure.


Also, bear in mind that things like switching utilities to a single meter are surprisingly complicated. And of course you'll need to own the freehold first.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • The editing was clumsy and made it look like he said something specific, that he did not. That is obviously wrong, and the BBC have apologised and people have lost their jobs as a result. That said, the overall impression - that Trump repeatedly stated (and still does) that the election had been stolen, that he encouraged his supporters to march on the Capitol, that he repeatedly called for people to fight - in short that he inspired a violent insurrection - is entirely true.  Trump used the word 'fight' 20 times. Whilst his speech was going on, his supporters chanted "Take the Capitol", "Invade the Capitol", "Storm the Capitol" and "Fight for Trump" The documentary generally, was not misleading. The real scandal is that Trump wasn't tried and ended up back in power. I do think that we need to stop normalising Trump. He has a criminal history and is openly corrupt. He has shown himself to be a threat to democracy. The US right and their tech billionaire allies are having an malign impact on UK politics and culture, interfering both directly and indirectly, in ways that we should be doing more to challenge.
    • @beansprout I don't think Gails has closed, Do you mean Megans? I've never seen waiters at Gails. If you do mean Megans unfortunately I believe its just closed for refurbishment to be relaunched as some similarly awful 'concept'
    • Staff have changed and owner now taking a more active role….she is such a nice+lady so I encourage you to try again . I am all for supporting local business and personally very glad after appalling service earlier this year Gail’s has closed.. Change of staff and chefs were unreal.. In one month alone must have had at least 4 new chefs plus god knows how many waiters/ waitresses.. when Ai saw that happening, new it was gonna be down hill all the way.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...