Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello all,


Not really a family room issue, but lots of people in here have experience with building works, so maybe one of you can help...


So we have had a whole load of works done on a building I'm associated with.


This particular chunk of work has cost around ?30K - there is another chunk coming which will cost around ?150K.


We have a surveyor managing the project - he put together specification and put it out to tender. 4 companies tendered for the work.


We have now been billed an amount greater than the amount specified in the tender.


Certain issues have come up which may have involved more work than they expected, however no contingency was made for these items. Contingency was made for other possibilities which did not arise.


I have 2 questions

1. Is it allowable for the contractor to bill a higher amount than was tendered?

2. Is it standard practice to be flexible with the part of the budget allowed for contingency? That is, say ?1000 contingency was made for floors; and when the work was done, no extra work was required on the floors, but it turned out that extra work was required on the windows. Is it standard practice to allow the contingency to be used for a different item?


Any help appreciated


thank you

Claire

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
    • No party is willing to tackle the "elephant in the room" which is the national debt. It is costing the country circa £100 Billion ANNUALLY to service that debt. That is more than the defence and education budgets. That debt burden has to be reduced which in reality means cost cuts. That means cutting back state pensions, index-linked pensions for civil servants and others such as police, NHS etc. It means cutting back on universal credit and cutting the number of people who are claiming benefits.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...