Jump to content

re: residential sales negotiator required


Haart

Recommended Posts

Negotiator - residential sales


haart estate agents are a well-established local business with the backing of a major national company. Our Dulwich office is looking for a new person to join its sales team, so that we can continue to serve the busy local property market.


As a sales negotiator for haart you?ll need to be responsive, be able to treat people as individuals, and have the capacity to act as an advisor - not just an agent.


We enjoy a healthy relationship with the neighbourhood, and are looking for a person not only with high selling skills, but also with good local knowledge. As a member of the sales team your credentials will include an understanding of local schools, amenities and transport links into Central London.


Our office is on Lordship Lane. We're a major player in the local property market, and sell property primarily in SE22, SE15, SE23, SE21 and SE4. Living in the area is likely to be an advantage, as is any experience in property marketing. You?ll need a clean driver?s licence, and should be well-spoken and presentable. Training and company car will be given to the successful person.


Interested candidates should in the first instance forward their CVs to [email protected] or if you're passing then please drop your CV in to us at haart, 103-105 Lordship Lane, London SE22 8HU


Many thanks

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Ah yes, of course, I'd forgotten that the cases will be heard by judges and not Mags. But how does losing juries mean less work for barristers, though? Surely all the other problems (no courtrooms, loos, witnesses etc etc) that stop cases going to trial, or slow trials down - will still exist? Then they'll still be billing the same? 
    • It's not magistrates that are needed, it's judges and they will rattle through these cases whether the loos are working or not. Barristers get a brief fee and a day rate. 
    • I'm not sure that's true. I don't know how they bill (and I might be wrong) but I doubt they get paid each time they turn up at court and a witness or defendant fails to show, or the printer's broken, or  the loos have flooded, or whatever. I think most remaining criminal barristers and solicitors these days (now there's no money in it) genuinely care about the justice system and would like to see trials coming to court quicker, but not like this. Plus, I don't see how these measures will help - they won't suddenly magic up all the courtrooms the system demands (that prev govts shut down), and do we even have enough mags to pick up all the extra non jury cases that will arise? Picking and panelling juries isn't what's causing the delay in trials going to court.     
    • Well, this is it isn’t  it?    this does see to be an ongoing problem since oooh I’m gonna say 2016. For some reason  governments playing to a populist right wing media without foundations in reality, all in the hope of a supportive headline that will never come 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...